Migration 2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108778497.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…151–60; Fine, 2019). Political theorists and social scientists alike draw attention to the racist undertones that often characterise these policies (Chung, 2020; De Genova, 2018; Fine, 2016; Jaggar, 2020; Kukathas, 2020; Owen, 2020). So, despite their apparent immobility, large parts of the population might be open to the prospect of moving, or might be aspiring to move.…”
Section: Mobility and Immobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…151–60; Fine, 2019). Political theorists and social scientists alike draw attention to the racist undertones that often characterise these policies (Chung, 2020; De Genova, 2018; Fine, 2016; Jaggar, 2020; Kukathas, 2020; Owen, 2020). So, despite their apparent immobility, large parts of the population might be open to the prospect of moving, or might be aspiring to move.…”
Section: Mobility and Immobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of mobile migration reveals another gap in the dominant approaches to migration ethics: a lack of systematic engagement with the concepts of both mobility and settlement. Many arguments in migration ethics focus on whether and under which conditions people have a right to migrate, and whether the state has the right to control migration (e.g., Carens, 2013; Cole, 2000; Fine, 2019; Kukathas, 2020; and Oberman, 2016). This is important but incomplete.…”
Section: Mobile Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations