2007
DOI: 10.1080/08038740701544025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: New Forms of Intimacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As I have previously noted (Rysst, 2016, p. 162), post-structuralist researchers (e.g., Henrietta Moore, 1994) have argued that multiple identities or selves are acted out in different social contexts. Modern and post-structuralist conceptualizations of the self differ in that the former reads the self as having a core, while the latter views the self as fragmented (Lorentzen & Muhleisen, 2006). Moore argues that a single subject can no longer be equated with a single individual, as each individual is a multiply constituted subject and "take[s] up multiple subject positions within a range of discourses and social practices" (Moore, 1994, p. 55).…”
Section: Gender Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I have previously noted (Rysst, 2016, p. 162), post-structuralist researchers (e.g., Henrietta Moore, 1994) have argued that multiple identities or selves are acted out in different social contexts. Modern and post-structuralist conceptualizations of the self differ in that the former reads the self as having a core, while the latter views the self as fragmented (Lorentzen & Muhleisen, 2006). Moore argues that a single subject can no longer be equated with a single individual, as each individual is a multiply constituted subject and "take[s] up multiple subject positions within a range of discourses and social practices" (Moore, 1994, p. 55).…”
Section: Gender Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%