“…Of the 42 articles, 14 (33%) were of good quality [ 17 , 19 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 33 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 49 ], 16 (38%) were of fair quality [ 14 , 15 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 28 , 35 , 37 , 46 – 48 , 50 – 53 , 55 ] and 12 (29%) were of low quality [ 16 , 18 , 20 , 22 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 , 39 , 42 , 45 , 54 ] based on our modified NOS scoring system ( table 1 ). Low-quality articles were typically single-centre studies, tertiary-care settings or populations selected for specific illnesses.…”