2015
DOI: 10.17140/sroj-2-107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Approach: Decreasing the Abdominal Hysterectomy Approach or Replacing Vaginal Hysterectomy

Abstract: CitationMcLeod JB, Cao J, Spiryda LB. Introduction of laparoscopic hysterectomy approach: decreasing the ab- It has been noted in the medical literature that abdominal hysterectomy rates continue to be over 66%, with less than one-third of hysterectomies performed via minimally invasive approaches despite the rapidity of recovery. We compared trends in hysterectomy routes for the years 2000 and 2010 at our institution. Methods: Expedited IRB approval was obtained for a retrospective chart review of all hyster… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even those teleological narratives recounting the history of gynaecological surgery as the triumph of men’s science over women’s folk medicine and which refer to a progressive refining of modern surgical technique, have nonetheless often also acknowledged that the safer and more technical methods have often not been widely favoured in practice ( O’Dowd and Philipp 1994 , vii; Litynski 1999 ). Several recent gynaecology researchers have pointed to a significant deskilling of surgeons in the late twentieth century, in the relative decline of the more technically demanding vaginal hysterectomy with its shorter recovery time for patients, and an increase of the technically simpler, open-cut abdominal-entry methods which leave visible scars, are more painful, require longer convalescence, and are more likely to impact women’s core-muscular function, pelvic integrity and bladder control postsurgery ( McCloud, Cao, and Spiryda 2015 ; Panza, Heft, and Zimmerman 2018 ).…”
Section: Race Class Caste and Radical Gynaecological Surgeriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even those teleological narratives recounting the history of gynaecological surgery as the triumph of men’s science over women’s folk medicine and which refer to a progressive refining of modern surgical technique, have nonetheless often also acknowledged that the safer and more technical methods have often not been widely favoured in practice ( O’Dowd and Philipp 1994 , vii; Litynski 1999 ). Several recent gynaecology researchers have pointed to a significant deskilling of surgeons in the late twentieth century, in the relative decline of the more technically demanding vaginal hysterectomy with its shorter recovery time for patients, and an increase of the technically simpler, open-cut abdominal-entry methods which leave visible scars, are more painful, require longer convalescence, and are more likely to impact women’s core-muscular function, pelvic integrity and bladder control postsurgery ( McCloud, Cao, and Spiryda 2015 ; Panza, Heft, and Zimmerman 2018 ).…”
Section: Race Class Caste and Radical Gynaecological Surgeriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) database search, the most frequent gynaecologic procedures (excluding termination of pregnancy and dilation and curettage) in community hospitals totalled 1,649,000 in 2012, a 796,824 decline from 2,445,824 in 2007 [1]. Hysterectomies in particular decreased 247,613 from 681,234 in 2002 to 433,621 in 2010 [2]. The introduction of roboticassisted surgery further reduced resident participation in surgery [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%