1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)90093-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction of multi-criteria decision making in optimization procedures for high-performance liquid chromatographic separations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For better understanding of the typical factors which govern the retention, a complementary set of experiments as fold-over design was performed (Table II, experiments [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. This represents a fold-over of the previous design and is obtained by changing the sign of the three last columns of the fractional design.…”
Section: Fold-over Fractional Factorial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For better understanding of the typical factors which govern the retention, a complementary set of experiments as fold-over design was performed (Table II, experiments [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. This represents a fold-over of the previous design and is obtained by changing the sign of the three last columns of the fractional design.…”
Section: Fold-over Fractional Factorial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to optimize the time of the chromatographic analysis and the resolution, chemometric methods of experimental design, multivariate analysis, and multi-criteria decision-making (Pareto-optimality) [17] were employed. The six experimental variables considered were SDS concentration; the organic modifier concentration, Cm; the alkyl chain length of organic modifier, N; pH of the mobile phase, flow rate Fl, and type of column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les fonctions existant dans la littérature ne convenant pas à nos besoins [26][27][28][29][30][31], nous avons donc essayé de construire une fonction réponse de robustesse qui vise à reproduire de manière quantifiée et objective ce qui en général est laissé à l'appréciation intuitive de l'analyste expérimenté.…”
Section: La Fonction De Robustesseunclassified
“…Balancing these goals against each other should result in the most acceptable solution to the optimization problem. In HPLC, there have been attempts to solve this problem using different methods from multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) [20][21][22][23]. All of them have advantages and disadvantages and the choice for application of any of those approaches depends on the particular problem and on the chromatographic expertise of the user itself [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%