1995
DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00224-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction of Norplant® implants in four counties of rural China: A two-year evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dizziness: Reports indicate that 4%-11% of contraceptive implant users experience dizziness. The rate of dizziness tends to be higher in Norplant users than nonhormonal controls [ 34 ]. According to Brache et al, the annual occurrence rate was higher during the first year than subsequent years of use (5%-8% versus 3%-4%) [ 12 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dizziness: Reports indicate that 4%-11% of contraceptive implant users experience dizziness. The rate of dizziness tends to be higher in Norplant users than nonhormonal controls [ 34 ]. According to Brache et al, the annual occurrence rate was higher during the first year than subsequent years of use (5%-8% versus 3%-4%) [ 12 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of published papers feature results from the project, but only a couple-on receptivity to Norplant (Zenger, Qiu, and Fang 1995;Tu et al 1998)-are specifically related to the "treatments" adumbrated in Table 1. Most (Smith 1994;Tu 1995;Tu and Smith 1995;Qian 1997;Merli 1998;Merli and Raftery 2000;Merli and Smith 2002) do not, and none take any real account of the experimental design.…”
Section: Considerations In the Study's Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Norplant termination rate during the study was the lowest of all counties, despite a comparatively high incidence of side effects (Zenger, Qiu, and Fang 1995). Was this an indication of difficult access to services in the most mountainous of the four counties?…”
Section: The Households They Selected For Our Visits All Displayed Thmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A range of tools and resources exist for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of family planning programs ( Adamou et al, 2013 ; Barden O’Fallon & Bisgrove, 2016 ; MEASURE Evaluation, 2018 ). Research studies evaluating pilot introductions of new contraceptive methods—including review of service statistics in some cases—are also well documented in the literature ( Garza-Flores et al, 1998 ; Gribble, Lundgren, Velasquez, & Anastasi, 2008 ; Hubacher, Akora, Masaba, Chen, & Veena, 2014 ; Lundgren et al, 2012 ; Zenger, Shuhua, & Huimin, 1995 ). However, there is a lack of published material to guide the specific process for using monitoring systems to generate data on pilot introductions of new contraceptive technologies in national family planning programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%