2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-015-0581-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction of simplex-informational descriptors for QSPR analysis of fullerene derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that vertices 1 and 2 for C 32 , as well as vertices 7,8,9,10,13,14,43,44,45,46,49, 50 for C 78 are achiral (marked as Ø is following tables) because there are at least two topologically equivalent terminal vertices in respective simplexes (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Results: the Assessment Of Equivalence/nonequivalence Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that vertices 1 and 2 for C 32 , as well as vertices 7,8,9,10,13,14,43,44,45,46,49, 50 for C 78 are achiral (marked as Ø is following tables) because there are at least two topologically equivalent terminal vertices in respective simplexes (Fig. 8).…”
Section: Results: the Assessment Of Equivalence/nonequivalence Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, IF reflects information about the distribution of the target property in space. Nowadays, IF theory was utilized as a powerful descriptive tool for "structure-property" tasks [3,4,[6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eclectic data are translated into optimal nano-descriptors (the sum of weights of quasi-SMILES) for the outcome prediction and Monte Carlo optimization is used to select the optimal descriptors. Optimal-based SMILES descriptors can be calculated with the International Chemical Identifier (https://iupac.org/who-we-are/divisions/division-details/inchi/ (Webpage accessed autumn 2019)) even though, as noted by References [84,85], SMILES-based descriptors can have some drawbacks for describing endpoints for some NMs and for the interpretability of the models. To overcome the limitations of optimal-SMILES, the Improved SMILES-Based Optimal Descriptors has been proposed [84] as a novel descriptor characterizing structural and chemical properties, which interprets the endpoint more accurately.…”
Section: Molecular Structures' Codificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies,experimental as well as computational, are known in the literature to analyze the solubility of fullerenes, but mainly available for the solubility of C 60 fullerenes in diverse solvents . The in‐silico (computational) studies have an advantage over the in‐vivo and in‐vitro (experimental) studies as the former are cost effective, less laborious, and can be analyzed simultaneously for diverse solvents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%