2016
DOI: 10.19088/1968-2016.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Opening Governance – Change, Continuity and Conceptual Ambiguity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, civil service managers need to commit to a clear, collective conceptual understanding of the essential attributes of open data that actualise its purposes, and thus deliver tangible benefits (cf. McGee and Edwards, 2016). At the very least, the UK government could bring greater transparency to its transparency project by insisting on a clearer separation of informational and OGD compliant publications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, civil service managers need to commit to a clear, collective conceptual understanding of the essential attributes of open data that actualise its purposes, and thus deliver tangible benefits (cf. McGee and Edwards, 2016). At the very least, the UK government could bring greater transparency to its transparency project by insisting on a clearer separation of informational and OGD compliant publications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, two main research agendas on open government have evolved simultaneously. On one hand, multiple efforts have been devoted to the definition and characteristics of open government (McGee and Edwards, 2016). On the other hand, there have been various attempts at measuring it (Ingrams, 2017).…”
Section: Understanding Openness As An Observable Government Attributementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement seeks radical democratic transformation by leveraging the value of data for society through three principles: i) openness, ii) participation, and iii) collaboration (Davies, Perini and Alonso, 2013;White House, 2009). Thus, the opening of government data is not the ultimate objective, rather it is a very important democratic mechanism to promote citizen engagement in challenging and assisting open governments (Davies and Perini, 2016;McGee and Edwards, 2016;Schrock and Shaffer, 2017). OGD emerged as an important, multilateral movement among state administrations after the turn of the 21 st century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%