Seeing Race Again 2019
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvcwp0hd.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality criteria urge researchers to be transparent about their access to and use of power and the privileges afforded by the QR process. This transparency means noting a long history of exclusion and marginalization by researchers and research situated in marginalized communities (e.g., immigrant, Black, disabled) that does little, if anything, to improve the lives and educational outcomes of members of those communities (Crenshaw et al, 2019;Esposito & Evans-Winters, 2022). Tuck (2009) suggested that many outsiders have benefited from documenting damaging narratives about communities and that these communities must now hold researchers accountable for advancing equitable research frameworks to promote change.…”
Section: Reflexivity Questions and Indicators To Extend Foundational ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quality criteria urge researchers to be transparent about their access to and use of power and the privileges afforded by the QR process. This transparency means noting a long history of exclusion and marginalization by researchers and research situated in marginalized communities (e.g., immigrant, Black, disabled) that does little, if anything, to improve the lives and educational outcomes of members of those communities (Crenshaw et al, 2019;Esposito & Evans-Winters, 2022). Tuck (2009) suggested that many outsiders have benefited from documenting damaging narratives about communities and that these communities must now hold researchers accountable for advancing equitable research frameworks to promote change.…”
Section: Reflexivity Questions and Indicators To Extend Foundational ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research can move beyond narratives of brokenness, pathology, and damage by examining dialectical understandings of disability as a multifaceted, situated experience that is nonetheless negotiated and navigated in agentive, resilient, and powerful ways. Specifically, research that considers both marginalization and resilience illustrates how disability can be affected by complex experiences, such as exposure to structural inequalities and access to cultural capital, or language barriers and linguistic ingenuity (Crenshaw et al, 2019;Kangas, 2020). For example, Romano et al (2023) found that as transition planning for students who were identified at school as disabled English learners often focused on immediate challenges, such as passing English fluency exams, families and the students themselves pursued postsecondary education and career development planning outside of school.…”
Section: Reflexivity Questions and Indicators To Extend Foundational ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant narratives also privilege theories and frameworks from the Global North and ignore the Global South (Alcadipani et al, 2012). Finally, management research frequently invokes a kind of colorblindness found throughout the Academy (Crenshaw et al, 2019). Teachers advocate equality but do not consider how racism, sexism, and classism create and perpetuate biased disciplinary content, classroom policies, and pedagogical practices that negatively impact marginalized students (Love, 2019).…”
Section: Narratives and Counterstorytellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2022 ), higher education ( Yosso et al. , 2004 ; Crenshaw et al. , 2019 ), and social science and education research ( Bonilla-Silva and Baiocchi, 2001 ; Harper 2012b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%