Post-Truth and the Mediation of Reality 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25670-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Post-truth and the Mediation of Reality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…p. 269, italics in the original): ‘Althusser, after all, attends to the Imaginary element of ideology. That is, that ideology works very well indeed, provided the Symbolic structures to which it appeals are underpinned by an Imaginary relation that is, well, relatable , for the subject’ (Overell, 2019: 116, capital letters and italics in the original). In order to be effective, propaganda needs to include more positive feelings to reassure the audience: for Žižek (1994), ‘ideology is not confusing but reassuring’ (p. 7), and as Auerbach and Castronovo (2013) explain, drawing on Žižek (1994), ‘ideology works by affect, fulfilling a comforting function to protect us from the overwhelming chaos of undifferentiated signification’ (p. 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p. 269, italics in the original): ‘Althusser, after all, attends to the Imaginary element of ideology. That is, that ideology works very well indeed, provided the Symbolic structures to which it appeals are underpinned by an Imaginary relation that is, well, relatable , for the subject’ (Overell, 2019: 116, capital letters and italics in the original). In order to be effective, propaganda needs to include more positive feelings to reassure the audience: for Žižek (1994), ‘ideology is not confusing but reassuring’ (p. 7), and as Auerbach and Castronovo (2013) explain, drawing on Žižek (1994), ‘ideology works by affect, fulfilling a comforting function to protect us from the overwhelming chaos of undifferentiated signification’ (p. 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population did not feel concerned by this discourse. Overell (2019) explains this relatedness to the collective imaginary by referring to Althusser (2012 (1971); who contends that ‘the individual is interpellated as a (free) subject in order that he shall submit freely to the commandments of the Subject, i.e. in order that he shall (freely) accept his subjection ’.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, “ludic authoritarianism” enables understanding how game workers produce authoritarian technological imaginations by remaining indifferent to their creative productions’ political outcomes because they fetishize freedom in their racialized and gendered design choices. Third, theorizing DWYL as fantasy shows that authoritarianism is not simply a deviant form of politics found in non-Western contexts but a diffuse culture intrinsic to neoliberalism (Bloom 2016a) and media performance logics (Ouelette 2020). Especially in the context of Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter, the ensuing layoffs, his jokes following the takeover, and his broader views on democracy, ethnographically and theoretically linking love with authoritarianism in the creative workplace undermines the conventional logic that associates technology and love with progress and democracy.…”
Section: What To Do With Love and Its Cruelties At Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%