Queer and Trans Madness 2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-90413-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Queer and Trans Madness: Struggles for Social Justice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these 27 works, Containing Madness (Kitty & Dej, 2018); Critical Inquires for Social Justice in Mental Health (Morrow & Malcoe, 2017); Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies (LeFrançois et al, 2013); Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement (Spandler et al, 2015); Searching for a Rose Garden: Challenging Psychiatry, Fostering Mad Studies (Russo & Sweeney, 2016); Interrogating psychiatric narratives of madness: Documented lives (Daley & Pilling, 2021); Literatures of Madness: Disability Studies and Mental Health (Donaldson, 2018); and The Routledge International Handbook of Mad Studies (Beresford & Russo, 2021), met the search criteria. To broaden the sample, I searched Google Scholar using Mad Studies as my principal search term, which produced two additional books asserting a Mad Studies focus: Queer and trans madness: Struggles for social justice (Pilling, 2022) and Madness and the demand for recognition: A philosophical inquiry into identity and mental health activism (Rashed, 2019).…”
Section: Locating Mad Studies Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 27 works, Containing Madness (Kitty & Dej, 2018); Critical Inquires for Social Justice in Mental Health (Morrow & Malcoe, 2017); Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies (LeFrançois et al, 2013); Madness, Distress and the Politics of Disablement (Spandler et al, 2015); Searching for a Rose Garden: Challenging Psychiatry, Fostering Mad Studies (Russo & Sweeney, 2016); Interrogating psychiatric narratives of madness: Documented lives (Daley & Pilling, 2021); Literatures of Madness: Disability Studies and Mental Health (Donaldson, 2018); and The Routledge International Handbook of Mad Studies (Beresford & Russo, 2021), met the search criteria. To broaden the sample, I searched Google Scholar using Mad Studies as my principal search term, which produced two additional books asserting a Mad Studies focus: Queer and trans madness: Struggles for social justice (Pilling, 2022) and Madness and the demand for recognition: A philosophical inquiry into identity and mental health activism (Rashed, 2019).…”
Section: Locating Mad Studies Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking closer at the theory and praxis on which psychiatry is founded, we see that psychiatric theory is maintained by practices that routinely compromise rights, fail to be transparent about its own shortcomings and failures (Scull, 2022) but also seek to ensure domination over patient narratives and counter narratives and history (Reaume, 2007). Even today, as psychiatry continues to vie for domination over patient narratives/counter narratives (Million, 2013;Daley & Pilling 2021, Pilling, 2022 Mad Studies praxis pushes back against this supremacy. 2 In our view, Mad Studies has a right to preserve its scholarship and claim space in arenas that hold structural power (such as medicine, psychology, law).…”
Section: Mad Studies: Master or Meta Discipline?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our desire is for the journal to create much-needed space for ongoing critique of the constraining systems, structures and ideologies that dictate which bodyminds, behaviours, lived experiences, and knowledges are deemed sufficiently "scholarly", credible and valid (Clare, 2017;Gorman et al, 2013;LeFrançois & Voronka, 2022;Pilling, 2022). We seek to make opportunities to redress barriers to lived experience leadership that exist in all layers of the academic ecosystem (Scholz et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seeking Validation and Avoiding Co-optionmentioning
confidence: 99%