2021
DOI: 10.1086/714823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Reusing Research Film and the Institute for Scientific Film

Abstract: This introduction outlines the threefold contribution that this Focus section on research film offers. First, it introduces the vast collection of films from the former Institute for Scientific Film (Institut für den Wissenschaftlichen Film [IWF]), arguably the most ambitious endeavor ever undertaken to manage the distribution, production, and archiving of research films. At the same time, the institute's questionable roots in the National Socialist education system and in war research are addressed. Second, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By pointing out the range of variations that the same material can cycle throughout history, our aim is to better map the aesthetic, intermedial and cultural transformations associated with the constant 'reuse' and 'recycling practices' of film material. We want to show that scientific films cannot be fully understood at just one point in their existence but rather through their processes and ongoing analog as well as digital (re)cyclings (Sattelmacher, Schulze, and Waltenspül 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By pointing out the range of variations that the same material can cycle throughout history, our aim is to better map the aesthetic, intermedial and cultural transformations associated with the constant 'reuse' and 'recycling practices' of film material. We want to show that scientific films cannot be fully understood at just one point in their existence but rather through their processes and ongoing analog as well as digital (re)cyclings (Sattelmacher, Schulze, and Waltenspül 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%