Introduction: rising states, rising donors and the global aid regime

Chin, Gregory T.; Quadir, Fahimul

doi:10.1080/09557571.2012.744642

Cited by 66 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…79 Second, China has endorsed the World Summit Outcome Document of 2005, including its references to the principle of Responsibility to Protect, albeit with the caveat that the UN Security Council must sanction any operations prompted by the principle. 81 The Export-Import Bank of China provides a greater volume of loans than the G7 states combined; along with the China Development Bank, it lends more to developing states than the World Bank. 81 The Export-Import Bank of China provides a greater volume of loans than the G7 states combined; along with the China Development Bank, it lends more to developing states than the World Bank.…”

Section: The Future Of Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The past, present, and future of intervention

Lawson¹,

Tardelli²

2013

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the prominent place of intervention in contemporary world politics, debate is limited by two weaknesses: first, an excessive presentism; and second, a focus on normative questions to the detriment of analysis of the longer-term sociological dynamics that fuel interventionary pressures. In keeping with the focus of the Special Issue on the ways in which intervention is embedded within modernity, this article examines the emergence of intervention during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, assesses its place in the contemporary world, and considers its prospects in upcoming years. The main point of the article is simplealthough intervention changes in character across time and place, it is a persistent feature of modern international relations. As such, intervention is here to stay.

show abstract

Section: The Future Of Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The past, present, and future of intervention

Lawson¹,

Tardelli²

2013

Rev. Int. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For many governments and research institutions understanding what Brazil is doing in the field of development co-operation has become a priority, particularly when placed in the context of rising concern about the development assistance-like activities of China and, increasingly, India (Bräutigam, 2009;Chin and Quadir, 2013;Quadir, 2013;Rowlands, 2012;Strauss and Saavedra, 2009;Samy, 2010;Shaw et al, 2009;Stuenkel, 2010;Woods, 2008). The result has been a series of studies outlining the scope and procedures of Brazilian ODA, with the survey by the government-supported Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada standing as the most official Brazilian statement on budgetary questions (IPEA, 2010), although there are reports by other private and government research bodies (Cabral and Weinstock, 2010;Dauvergne and Farias, 2012;Inoue and Vaz, 2012;Milani and Carvalho, 2013;Pino, 2012;Pino and Leite, 2010;Stolte, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Brazil's International Development Co‐operation: Old and New Motivations

Burges

2014

Development Policy Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brazil has entered the world of development assistance, but with its own twist. This article argues that Brazil is taking a cross‐government policy approach to the provision of development assistance, and which includes recruitment of business interests. There is a genuine concern with global poverty alleviation in Brazil, but this does not preclude policy‐makers from using aid and development‐related activities to advance national interests. The added quirk that sets Brazil apart from Northern counterparts is that the provision of development assistance offers significant benefits in terms of building up international bureaucratic experience inside the country and helping national firms internationalise their market activities.

show abstract

“…However, China is not simply being socialised into the western liberal OECD norms in aid, it has always followed its own practice of aid (Brautigam, 2009). In fact, alternative practices in aid and peacebuilding by BRICS countries have already begun challenge liberal OECD models of aid and peacebuilding (Chin and Quadir, 2013;Richmond and Tellidis, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

African East-Asian Affairs No 4 (2013)

Esterhuyse

2014

AEAA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: rising states, rising donors and the global aid regime

Cited by 66 publications

References 11 publications

The past, present, and future of intervention

The past, present, and future of intervention

Brazil's International Development Co‐operation: Old and New Motivations

African East-Asian Affairs No 4 (2013)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About