Drones and Unmanned Aerial Systems 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23760-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Situating Drones in Surveillance Societies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These technologies may offer tremendous benefits, including increased precision and accuracy, as well as automation of military measures and counterterrorism programs; however, some researchers have highlighted concerns that autonomous AI-based drones and technologies in the military will ramp up discriminatory practices and unaccountable military activity on a political and legal level [ 58 ]. Furthermore, research have demonstrated that applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and drones constitute complex technologies augmented by a variety of technologies [ 69 ], necessitating the development of specialized legal frameworks to address civil liberties and privacy concerns [ 18 ]. Non-combatant civilians are being killed by military drones, igniting much controversy [ 6 ].…”
Section: Topic Modeling and Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These technologies may offer tremendous benefits, including increased precision and accuracy, as well as automation of military measures and counterterrorism programs; however, some researchers have highlighted concerns that autonomous AI-based drones and technologies in the military will ramp up discriminatory practices and unaccountable military activity on a political and legal level [ 58 ]. Furthermore, research have demonstrated that applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and drones constitute complex technologies augmented by a variety of technologies [ 69 ], necessitating the development of specialized legal frameworks to address civil liberties and privacy concerns [ 18 ]. Non-combatant civilians are being killed by military drones, igniting much controversy [ 6 ].…”
Section: Topic Modeling and Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, drones present multiple legal and moral dilemmas (Cohn and Tutu, 2015; Di Nucci and Santoni de Sio, 2016; Završnik, 2016). The most controversial is the question of arming drones and robots, highlighted in 2016 when a man was killed by an armed robot in Dallas, and in 2022 when San Francisco decided the police could use armed drones, a decision that was later reversed (Hambling, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drones polarise opinion, and whereas some have embraced them with 'enthusiastic acceptance', others face them with 'relentless opposition' (Završnik, 2016). Many scholars find drones problematic, a critique often connected to their military origins, where they have also been used with lethal outcome (Bergen and Rowland, 2013;Chamayou and Lloyd, 2015;Davis, 2019;Hazelton, 2012;Pugliese, 2013;Sandvik, 2017;Stelmark, 2015), and where the technology has been regarded as dehumanising (Wall and Monahan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%