2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40656-018-0230-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: sketches of a conceptual history of epigenesis

Abstract: This is an introduction to a collection of articles on the conceptual history of epigenesis, from Aristotle to Harvey, Cavendish, Kant and Erasmus Darwin, moving into nineteenth-century biology with Wolff, Blumenbach and His, and onto the twentieth century and current issues, with Waddington and epigenetics. The purpose of the topical collection is to emphasize how epigenesis marks the point of intersection of a theory of biological development and a (philosophical) theory of active matter. We also wish to sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aristotle is frequently represented as an early supporter of epigenesis (for example, Peck asserts in a footnote on p. 144 of Generation of animals that 'Aristotle was an epigeneticist'). Unfortunately, it is all too easy to attribute modern understanding to ancient authors, giving later meaning to their language that was not intended, nor even understood at the time; the meanings of the terms epigenesis and preformation have changed almost continuously ever since they were first used, and it is risky to recruit antique authors to modern arguments [39]. And in fact, Aristotle's position on the question of epigenesis or preformation is never clearly stated [40].…”
Section: Aristotle: Both Epigenesis and Preformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aristotle is frequently represented as an early supporter of epigenesis (for example, Peck asserts in a footnote on p. 144 of Generation of animals that 'Aristotle was an epigeneticist'). Unfortunately, it is all too easy to attribute modern understanding to ancient authors, giving later meaning to their language that was not intended, nor even understood at the time; the meanings of the terms epigenesis and preformation have changed almost continuously ever since they were first used, and it is risky to recruit antique authors to modern arguments [39]. And in fact, Aristotle's position on the question of epigenesis or preformation is never clearly stated [40].…”
Section: Aristotle: Both Epigenesis and Preformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the eighteenth century, "epigenesis was understood as the idea that there was no preestablished organization whereas, with preformationism, the parts were already determined." (Maienschein, 2017;Nicoglou & Wolfe, 2018). Brzozowski's text, An Epigenetic Theory of History (1907) 9 , analyzes technical and epistemic problems embodied deep within the philosophical notion of the historical "fact," which he presents in terms of the absolute, insoluble, and rationalizing claim: "it was so" [tak było] (Brzozowski, 1910a).…”
Section: From Epigenetics To Epiphylogenetics On the Work Of Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epigenetics is defined as the study of heritable changes in gene function without alteration of DNA sequence. 1,2 Epigenetic marks primarily include DNA methylation, histone marks, noncoding RNA (ncRNA), and chromatin remodeling. Many studies have linked epigenetic modifications to both short-term and long-term environmental exposures in plants and animals (recently reviewed in Cavalli and Heard 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%