Handbook of Disability Studies 2001
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976251.n1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: The Formation of Disability Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the standard literature on welfare programs and the welfare state it is emphasized that classification of disability has become one of the major paths to assistance in most welfare countries today (see e.g. Abberley 2002, Albrecht, Seelman & Bury 2001, Drake 1999, Lane 1992, Stone 1985. Perhaps this can explain why these countries have the largest amount of disabled people in society (see Fujiura & Rutkowski-Kmitta 2001:78Á79)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the standard literature on welfare programs and the welfare state it is emphasized that classification of disability has become one of the major paths to assistance in most welfare countries today (see e.g. Abberley 2002, Albrecht, Seelman & Bury 2001, Drake 1999, Lane 1992, Stone 1985. Perhaps this can explain why these countries have the largest amount of disabled people in society (see Fujiura & Rutkowski-Kmitta 2001:78Á79)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 40 years, British disability studies has been premised on the view that disability, including childhood disability, is a sociological issue rejecting any understanding of disability that locates disability as a problem originating within the person (Albrecht, Seelman, and Bury 2001). In this way, disability studies distinguishes itself from childhood studies that so often focuses on individual, typical, child development.…”
Section: Disability Studies and Disabled Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 For a sample of important major works in the field of disability studies, though by no means exhaustive, see: Albrecht et al (2001), Corker and Shakespeare (2002), Davis (2002), Linton (1998), Mitchell and Snyder (2006), Oliver et al (2002). 2 A representative but non-exhaustive sampling of work employing a similar perspective would include, most notably, the work of Clifford Geertz, the pieces found in Philip Smith's The New American Cultural Sociology (1998) which cover a broad array of topics, and especially, Jeffrey Alexander's collection of essays titled Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology (2003).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%