2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11245-016-9367-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: The Geometry of the Visual Field—Early Modern and Contemporary Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human visual experience uncontroversially has a rich spatial structure that is typically characterised as presenting a visual field. Though the precise content and geometry of this field remain controversial (Matthiessen 2016), its existence is widely accepted by philosophers and scientists alike. The existence of comparable spatial structure in non-visual sensory modalities, including audition, however, is disputed, with many theorists who accept the existence of a visual spatial field rejecting the analogous notion of an auditory field on metaphysical or phenomenological grounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human visual experience uncontroversially has a rich spatial structure that is typically characterised as presenting a visual field. Though the precise content and geometry of this field remain controversial (Matthiessen 2016), its existence is widely accepted by philosophers and scientists alike. The existence of comparable spatial structure in non-visual sensory modalities, including audition, however, is disputed, with many theorists who accept the existence of a visual spatial field rejecting the analogous notion of an auditory field on metaphysical or phenomenological grounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%