2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05039-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”: Transnational Perspectives on the Extralegal Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationships between crime and the state, or more specifically between criminal organizations and governmental institutions or officials, 3 has received scholarly attention in the past decades, with a number of studies detailing how symbiotic relations between those actors -the so-called political-criminal nexus -are at times established and maintained for the benefit of both (e.g., Quinney 1972;Friedrichs 1983Friedrichs , 1998Michalowski 1985;Simon and Eitzen 1982;Barak 1991;Tunnell 1993;Ross 1998Ross , 2000Green and Ward 2000;Williams and Godson 2002;Godson 2003;Tombs 2012;Allum and Gilmour 2019). The political-criminal nexus can give rise to several forms of crime interdependence or 'symbiosis', such as mutualism (when both parts benefit), parasitism (when one part benefits but the other is harmed), or forms of passive assistance (where one party benefits from the other, without helping or harming it much) (Felson 2006), at times creating forms of overlapping regulatory spaces (Polese et al 2019). These studies are of great interest as they reverse and complicate the common belief that the state is a victim of crime, rather than an actor in its own account: by showing the Janus-face of contemporary states and their institutions, they create a real paradox as the state becomes the guardian of its own misdemeanours (Karstedt 2014).…”
Section: The Political-criminal Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between crime and the state, or more specifically between criminal organizations and governmental institutions or officials, 3 has received scholarly attention in the past decades, with a number of studies detailing how symbiotic relations between those actors -the so-called political-criminal nexus -are at times established and maintained for the benefit of both (e.g., Quinney 1972;Friedrichs 1983Friedrichs , 1998Michalowski 1985;Simon and Eitzen 1982;Barak 1991;Tunnell 1993;Ross 1998Ross , 2000Green and Ward 2000;Williams and Godson 2002;Godson 2003;Tombs 2012;Allum and Gilmour 2019). The political-criminal nexus can give rise to several forms of crime interdependence or 'symbiosis', such as mutualism (when both parts benefit), parasitism (when one part benefits but the other is harmed), or forms of passive assistance (where one party benefits from the other, without helping or harming it much) (Felson 2006), at times creating forms of overlapping regulatory spaces (Polese et al 2019). These studies are of great interest as they reverse and complicate the common belief that the state is a victim of crime, rather than an actor in its own account: by showing the Janus-face of contemporary states and their institutions, they create a real paradox as the state becomes the guardian of its own misdemeanours (Karstedt 2014).…”
Section: The Political-criminal Nexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of informality has been additionally understood to 'take shape through the neglect, denial or challenge of a formal source of authority and rule-making, including the state and its prerogative to regulate a particular aspect of its social or economic life' (Polese et al 2019:8). Polese et al (2019) point to cases in which state institutions do not regulate a particular exchange and interaction, so citizens mobilize in response to make up for this deficiency. Refugees' accounts presented in this paper point to the value of understanding informal practices as insurgence against state power and involve struggles for emplacements and formalization, under conditions in which the state displaces them and neglects to care for their wellbeing, imposes internal border regimes and threatens them with deportation.…”
Section: Migration Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other instances, members of the group (on an informal level), sell summer cocktails in parks. To this end, the work of SPO needs to be understood as taking place "in spite of the state" (Polese et al 2019) such as when the state does not care sufficiently about people's well-being and racializes them. Consequently citizens intervene and mobilise in order to make up for state neglect and deficiency (Polese et al 2017a;Polese and Morris 2015).…”
Section: Informal Endeavours and Solidaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enforcing new legislation is necessary because, in addition to actions which can already be perceived as illegal when judged by local criminal codes, there are actions which are legal but not necessarily socially acceptable (Polese, Russo, & Strazzari, 2019). The incident of Airiston Helmi is a good example of the latter, as foreign property ownership as such is not a negative phenomenon.…”
Section: Institutional Lensesmentioning
confidence: 99%