2008
DOI: 10.4000/samaj.1912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction. The Moral and Affectual Dimension of Collective Action in South Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I find it appropriate to apply AT to this analysis because it is concerned with alternative discourses in which dominant attitudes are challenged and renegotiated. Furthermore, it is more susceptible to textual analysis than other recent approaches which address the role of affect and emotions in collective identities and actions (see Blom and Jaoul 2008;Laclau 2005). Thus, AT focuses on interpersonal dimensions and offers a different perspective than CDA since the latter first and foremost underlines dominant representations or (re)productions of reality.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…I find it appropriate to apply AT to this analysis because it is concerned with alternative discourses in which dominant attitudes are challenged and renegotiated. Furthermore, it is more susceptible to textual analysis than other recent approaches which address the role of affect and emotions in collective identities and actions (see Blom and Jaoul 2008;Laclau 2005). Thus, AT focuses on interpersonal dimensions and offers a different perspective than CDA since the latter first and foremost underlines dominant representations or (re)productions of reality.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reflecting on the centrality of moral values in structuring political mobilization (Blom and Jaoul 2008), Kristina Garalytė's article shows the emerging tensions between the Dalit movement's ethics and divergent individual moralities among the Scheduled Caste (SC) students at Jawaharlal Nehru University. She presents a case study of a debate between two SC students, in which they argue over the moral demand of the Dalit movement to "pay back to society," and over their differing social mobility imaginaries.…”
Section: Overview Of the Special Issue And Research Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through these increasingly wrenching debates, the capacity of hindutva politics to mobilize varying degrees of outrage also becomes progressively more evident. Blom and Jaoul hold the processes of framing “discontent into the vocabulary of moral outrage” to “constitute specific dimensions of South Asia’s political culture [of] public dissent” (Blom & Jaoul 2008, p. 8)—but such reactions are hardly limited to the subcontinent. Quite the contrary, outrage as a distinctive mode of expressing public dissent finds tremendous play in Indian/Hindu diasporic contests over representation, further elaborating the logics by which hindutva is invoked in local praxis, in this case within parameters set by state‐sponsored multiculturalism.…”
Section: Misrepresentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%