2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58682-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: The Study of Gender, Diplomacy and Negotiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A seat at the table will be of little consequence if women's perspective and opinions are dismissed as less significant. Compared to other critical priorities such as military politics and economic concerns, it demonstrated that merely counting the increasing number of women doesn't mean that women count in foreign relations [32] , [39] .…”
Section: A Gender-transformative Approach To Seamentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A seat at the table will be of little consequence if women's perspective and opinions are dismissed as less significant. Compared to other critical priorities such as military politics and economic concerns, it demonstrated that merely counting the increasing number of women doesn't mean that women count in foreign relations [32] , [39] .…”
Section: A Gender-transformative Approach To Seamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The increasing SEA offences make it crucial to include rigorous training on gender equality values and to include a basic test on gender equality mandatory before joining humanitarian missions. Humanitarian diplomacy can play a pivotal role to train the humanitarian workforce on best practices to reduce SEA [30] – [32] .…”
Section: Humanitarian Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tickner puts her finger on the problem: "Citation of feminist work by non-feminists remains limited" (Tickner 2016, 6; also Sjoberg 2010). Others in the field have noted the determined gender blindness in the study of diplomacy and international relations, noting its poor track record compared with diplomatic history (Aggestam and Towns 2018), and it is true that the rise of new diplomatic history has led to a greater gender awareness in analyses of twentieth-century diplomacy, as is evident in the work of such historians as Frank Costigliola, Helen McCarthy, Kenneth Weisbrode, Molly Wood and Nevra Biltekin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%