2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to CCE-LTER: Responses of the California Current Ecosystem to climate forcing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is typical for CCE process cruises, each Cycle of the P1408 and P1604 cruises followed particular water masses as determined by surface salinity, temperature, and Chl a (e.g., Landry et al ; Goericke and Ohman ). Surface water (10–50 m) was anomalously warm by 0.8–1.5°C for all cycles during these two cruises (Zaba and Rudnick ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is typical for CCE process cruises, each Cycle of the P1408 and P1604 cruises followed particular water masses as determined by surface salinity, temperature, and Chl a (e.g., Landry et al ; Goericke and Ohman ). Surface water (10–50 m) was anomalously warm by 0.8–1.5°C for all cycles during these two cruises (Zaba and Rudnick ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The North Pacific EBUS along the northwest American coast is known as the California current system (CCS). Many research efforts have been carried out to better understand CCS circulation and California current ecosystem (CCE) dynamics and responses to climate forcing (Goericke & Ohman, 2015). In the CCS, for much of the year—but primarily in spring and summer (Di Lorenzo, 2003)—winds blow equatorward along the California coast.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the relationship between environmental drivers and krill distribution patterns can elucidate krill spatiotemporal variability, species interactions and improve prediction of ecosystem condition (Cury et al ). Long‐term monitoring of krill is a critical component of many ecosystem assessments globally (Smith et al , Sydeman et al , Goericke and Ohman , Ralston et al , Atkinson et al ), and the development of predictive models (i.e. species distribution models) from these datasets can map variability in krill habitat and inform spatial management of krill predators to achieve ecosystem‐based management objectives (Hazen et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%