Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Meet Innovation Systems 2020
DOI: 10.4337/9781789901184.00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Meet Innovation Systems: Synergies, policy lessons and overlooked dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This echoes with Schmutzler et al. (2020)'s note on the agency‐based dynamic processes of regional entrepreneurship. Hence, it is not only the access to the external knowledge environment but also proactive endeavors to cross‐fertilize between internal and external knowledge that underlie the eco‐systemic nature of startup innovation.…”
Section: Discussion: Regional Environment For Startup Versus Incumben...mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This echoes with Schmutzler et al. (2020)'s note on the agency‐based dynamic processes of regional entrepreneurship. Hence, it is not only the access to the external knowledge environment but also proactive endeavors to cross‐fertilize between internal and external knowledge that underlie the eco‐systemic nature of startup innovation.…”
Section: Discussion: Regional Environment For Startup Versus Incumben...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The ‘most prominent difference’ between the two, according to Schmutzler et al. (2020, p. 5), is that incumbent firms are the focal players in regional innovation systems, while startups are the focal players in entrepreneurial ecosystems. While the followers of entrepreneurial ecosystems address startups that are largely missing in the regional innovation system framework, they meanwhile do not consider the imperatives of established firms to support entrepreneurial leadership and innovative transformation under rapid technological changes—an emerging field captured by the notion of corporate entrepreneurship (see Phan et al., 2009 and Kuratko et al., 2015 for holistic reviews).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This book primarily addressed the first gap we have mentioned, the lack of linkages of new entrepreneurial ecosystem approaches with older innovation system thinking. In this book, we aimed to bridge older and new concepts in the literature and create synergies and policy lessons from the wider body of work investigating (eco)systemic dynamics to regional development and associated themes (Pugh et al., 2020; Schmutzler et al, 2020). The second contribution, a special issue in Local Economy (Tsvetkova et al., 2019), was focused primarily on the geographical limits of the system and ecosystem approaches in the predominant literature, bringing in papers that examine cases in Latin America (Freire‐Gibb & Gregson, 2019; Podcameni et al, 2019; Porras‐Paez & Schmutzler, 2019), South Africa (Grobbelaar & Uriona‐Maldonado, 2019), and Finland (Nordling, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Previous contributions to this stream of work include two edited books that broaden the geography of the innovation systems debate (Tsvetkova et al, 2017) and explore the linkages between innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems (Tsvetkova et al, 2020). The need to understand the context and to adjust systemic approaches to the local settings in which they are applied is clearly presented by contributions in these books (for summaries, see Schmutzler et al, 2017, 2020). An editorial in the Local Economy journal (Tsvetkova et al, 2019) offers further reflections on the applicability of the systems approaches outside of the Global North. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%