2005
DOI: 10.1198/tech.2005.s334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allowed for comparing the proposed Bayesian model to established classical methods. Second, we focused on methods that have been described in the psychological literature (Wilcox, 2012). While this allowed for comparing methods that would be familiar to psychologists, this decision also presented some limitations.…”
Section: Comparison To Classical Robust Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This allowed for comparing the proposed Bayesian model to established classical methods. Second, we focused on methods that have been described in the psychological literature (Wilcox, 2012). While this allowed for comparing methods that would be familiar to psychologists, this decision also presented some limitations.…”
Section: Comparison To Classical Robust Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yuen's method requires selection of the trimming proportion γ. This can simultaneously provide non-optimal data reduction (Wilcox, 2012) and can increase researcher degrees freedom in that each value of γ will produce a different p-value (Simmons, Nelson, & Simonsohn, 2011). In contrast, the M-estimation approach quantitatively determines the degree of trimming which allows for accommodating a wider class of distributions (e.g., skewed).…”
Section: One-step M-estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations