Sensory Evaluation Practices 2004
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012672690-9/50005-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Sensory Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
179
0
25

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
179
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…A sensory profile of the six grape nectar samples was obtained using quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA), according to the method proposed by Stone & Sidel (2004). QDA was performed only with nonsmoker panelists since its objective was product characterization.…”
Section: Sensory Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A sensory profile of the six grape nectar samples was obtained using quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA), according to the method proposed by Stone & Sidel (2004). QDA was performed only with nonsmoker panelists since its objective was product characterization.…”
Section: Sensory Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A descriptive analysis provides a complete quantitative description of the sensory properties of a product, and when a consumer test is also performed, it serves as a basis to identify the most important attributes of a product that affect and direct consumer preference (Stone & Sidel, 2004). In this case, partial least squares regression analyses (PLSR) can be used to relate the results of a quantitative descriptive analysis and consumer preference data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the difficulty of the consumer sensory test (80 consumers), studies were conducted only for six randomly selected samples, which provided a comprehensive examination. The set of a maximum of six samples made it possible to conduct a consumer study (4,47).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation seems to be consistent with data given by Stone and Sidel who reported that generally there are approximately 30% of consumers who fail to detect some sensory attribute at some level. So panel screening is an important practice in sensory testing (12).…”
Section: Tab 1 the Percentage Of Persons Who Obtained Positive Resumentioning
confidence: 99%