2016
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
1,661
3
17

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,816 publications
(1,700 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
19
1,661
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The models differ from each other in the way they handle competing events and by the type of hazard function they model on. Therefore, both models have different interpretations (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The models differ from each other in the way they handle competing events and by the type of hazard function they model on. Therefore, both models have different interpretations (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk ratio from the cause-specific Cox model (HR) does not translate verbatim to valid absolute risks, since in order to calculate these risks the cause-specific hazards of the competing events are also needed (32). However, for etiological questions, the cause-specific Cox model may be more appropriate, since the cause-specific hazard function represents the instantaneous rate of the event of interest among those still event free (28).…”
Section: Methodsological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cause-specific hazard models were used to address the competing risks of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death. 22 This approach is appropriate for addressing epidemiological questions of disease etiology. 23 We also found evidence that although engagement in a large variety of LTPA is beneficial in reducing mortality, the benefits are non-specific to cardiovascular health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were followed forward from the VCF placement until the VCF was retrieved, they died, they were lost to follow‐up, or the end of the study period. The 30‐, 60‐, 90‐, 180‐day, and 1‐year cumulative incidence of VCF retrieval was estimated using Fine and Gray's time‐to‐event, survival analysis methodology, accounting for death as a competing risk 24. Time to VCF retrieval was also reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%