Introduction to the field of creative enterprise

Groen, Arend J.; Walsh, Steven T.

doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.011

Cited by 34 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As research recognized the importance of technology-based entrepreneurship as the driver of dynamic capitalism (Kirchhoff, 1994) and force behind dynamic developments for example in nanotechnology (Walsh, 2003;Walsh, 2004) or pharmaceuticals (Tierney et al, 2013;Walsh et al, 2014), EE for technology entrepreneurship becomes even more relevant. Here the challenge is to prepare future leaders in entrepreneurship, innovation, and management of technology with a set of knowledge, skills and attitudes that enable them to address global challenges (Groen and Walsh, 2013). While the literature has identified common bodies of knowledge for TE (Yanez et al, 2010), didactics for technology-based entrepreneurship are still debated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment

Harms

2015

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

159

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Contemporary entrepreneurship education (EE) is often based around a team-based challenge such as creating a new venture or solving a startup problem. A creative and professional solution to such a challenge requires individual and team efforts. At the level of the individual student, selfregulated learning (SRL) is proposed as an effective way to learn in entrepreneurial projects. At the level of a student team, team learning and psychological safety are hypothesized to contribute to group performance. Yet, there is little evidence to support these claims. I seek to add to the literature by demonstrating the effects of SRL, team learning, and psychological safety on various assessment types in the context of an entrepreneurship class. Data is collected from 194 students in 41 groups. Analysis is performed with hierarchical linear modeling. The results suggest that SRL is positively related to assessments at the individual level. Team learning and psychological safety are positively related to assessments at the group level. The results inform educators, students, and entrepreneurs about effective learning strategies.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment

Harms

2015

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

159

102

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Indeed, small firm growth is neither linear nor described well by biological paradigms, which requires entrepreneurs to act as problem solvers (Orsen et al, 2000). Specifically, Groen and Walsh (2013) indicate that in order to successfully commercialize emerging and disruptive technologies, entrepreneurs need to engage in activities which are difficult to manage, such as alliance management and open innovation, and have to creatively develop new business models. Finally, Andries and Debackere (2007) indicate that firms in less mature and highvelocity industries will need to adapt their initial business plan in order to successfully develop.…”

Section: Creating Cognitive Stylementioning

confidence: 99%

Growth intentions among research scientists: A cognitive style perspective

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As technological innovations are increasingly initiated by creative enterprises (Groen and Walsh 2013) and technological start-ups play a key role in the economy (Maes and Sels 2014), this study focuses on this actor in the innovation system. In conclusion, we apply TIS in the strategic management domain, using an actor-oriented perspective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technological start-ups in the innovation system: an actor-oriented perspective

Jansma

Gosselt

Jong

2017

Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The functional approach of the Technological Innovation System (TIS) has become important in innovation theory to understand the dynamics of technological innovations. Until now, TIS has mainly been applied topdown from a policy perspective. The aim of this study was to investigate whether TIS can be used in the management domain, from an actororiented perspective, to explain the dynamics in which technological start-ups are involved when developing innovations. We interviewed the founders of 24 technological start-ups about their experiences with the developmental processes of their innovations. Our results highlight that the functions of TIS provide a useful framework to structure the interactions of technological start-ups. Especially the functions 'Resource Mobilisation' and 'Legitimation' appeared to be important functions for start-ups when developing an innovation. Our findings show that TIS is a promising framework for the strategic management domain that can offer guidance in the development of innovations. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Introduction to the field of creative enterprise

Cited by 34 publications

References 40 publications

Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment

Self-regulated learning, team learning and project performance in entrepreneurship education: Learning in a lean startup environment

Growth intentions among research scientists: A cognitive style perspective

Technological start-ups in the innovation system: an actor-oriented perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About