2020
DOI: 10.1177/0018720820914312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Human Factors Special Issue on User-Centered Design for Exoskeleton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, the scientific community has already addressed some of these issues in the past two decades: hundreds of studies have explored the biomechanical, physiological, and psychological implications of the interaction between humans and wearable robots (WRs) (Beckerle et al, 2017b(Beckerle et al, , 2019Pinto-Fernandez and Torricelli, 2020). This has been a multidisciplinary endeavor, which has resulted not only in scientific evidence and better robotic prototypes, but also in a plethora of potentially useful evaluation methods and protocols (Ghillebert et al, 2019;Ármannsdóttir et al, 2020;Davis et al, 2020). If well-organized and appropriately conveyed to the relevant users, a careful selection of these methods can become the foundation of a unified and standardized benchmarking ecosystem for WRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the scientific community has already addressed some of these issues in the past two decades: hundreds of studies have explored the biomechanical, physiological, and psychological implications of the interaction between humans and wearable robots (WRs) (Beckerle et al, 2017b(Beckerle et al, , 2019Pinto-Fernandez and Torricelli, 2020). This has been a multidisciplinary endeavor, which has resulted not only in scientific evidence and better robotic prototypes, but also in a plethora of potentially useful evaluation methods and protocols (Ghillebert et al, 2019;Ármannsdóttir et al, 2020;Davis et al, 2020). If well-organized and appropriately conveyed to the relevant users, a careful selection of these methods can become the foundation of a unified and standardized benchmarking ecosystem for WRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mentioned size/weight issues typical of stiff designs have motivated a growing number of research groups to adopt methods from the field of industrial design to truly understand user needs and design exoskeletal solutions tailored to the specific application (Schmidt et al, 2017;Laffranchi et al, 2018). In most of these works, the main user needs that still need to be overcome are diverse: reduced donning time, lighter structures, higher autonomy of use, higher freedom of movement, increased comfort, and so forth (Gorgey, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;Fritz et al, 2019;Davis et al, 2020). Researchers and companies are addressing the needs with different solutions.…”
Section: How Can Design Choices Facilitate the Adoption Of Exoskeletons?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many innovative works are driven by approaches that dedicate considerable effort to understanding user needs and proposing solutions that are tailored to specific end-user needs. For example, user-centered design techniques have been applied to increase adoption of exoskeleton technologies in applications such as medical (Almenara et al, 2017;Laffranchi et al, 2018;Meyer et al, 2019;Vassallo et al, 2020), industrial (Babič et al, 2017;Davis et al, 2020), and assistive (Wang et al, 2018). Such user-centered design approaches, which may additionally incorporate industrial and ergonomics design in the development process, could serve as useful and effective tools to foster the adoption of exoskeleton technology (Hill et al, 2017).…”
Section: How Can Design Choices Facilitate the Adoption Of Exoskeletons?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is widely accepted that a user-centered design approach is preferred to guarantee better acceptability and continuous use of exoskeletons [83]. This design approach generally involves the user in both the initial and iterative stages of the devices' development [84].…”
Section: Challenges For Pediatric Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%