2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the special issue: Understanding and linking the biophysical, socioeconomic and geopolitical effects of dams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this paper and others in this issue (e.g., Tullos et al, 2009;Wyrick et al, 2009) have highlighted the importance of assessing the impacts of dams from a multidisciplinary perspective. To facilitate such evaluation, we have introduced the IDAM tool, which allows decision-makers to assign objective metrics and subjective valuations to a range of biophysical, socio-economic and geopolitical effects of dam construction and removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, this paper and others in this issue (e.g., Tullos et al, 2009;Wyrick et al, 2009) have highlighted the importance of assessing the impacts of dams from a multidisciplinary perspective. To facilitate such evaluation, we have introduced the IDAM tool, which allows decision-makers to assign objective metrics and subjective valuations to a range of biophysical, socio-economic and geopolitical effects of dam construction and removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, a map of current land use (2011) (Jarmain et al, 2013) and the land use of 2000 (Van den Berg et al, 2008) were compared with the maps of trends of indicators of hydrologic alteration. Where the occurrence of trends in a flow regime was consistent with the changes in land use, this the temporal evolution of the land-use changes was further investigated.…”
Section: Land-use Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plans for these developments happen when Swaziland is not yet fully utilising its allocation under the Piggs Peak Agreement and the Interim IncoMaputo Agreement (TPTC, 2010). Experiences of other countries around the world show that dam construction has many, often wide-ranging and long-term, social and ecological impacts that often are negative and that frequently are irreversible, including the social upheaval caused by the resettlement of communities, loss of ecosystems and biodiversity, increased sediment trapping, irreversible alteration of flow regimes and the prohibitive cost of decommissioning (see, for an overview, Tullos et al, 2009, andMoore et al, 2010). It is therefore important to explore alternative options fully before deciding on the construction of more large dams.…”
Section: Implications Of These Findings For Water Resource Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that each HP project, large or small, is characterized by specific peculiarities that cannot be generalized. Nevertheless, due to long traditions in HP construction, on a general level, the financial calculus as well as the ecological, environmental and social impacts of large HP projects are well known and documented [35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: The Powershed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%