2020
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Special Issue

Abstract: People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing body of literature examining emotion and ER strategy use using EMA methods (Koval, Kalokerinos, Verduyn, & Greiff, 2020). For example, EMA work examining broad categories of negative and positive affect in adults has found that negative affect was associated with increased use of both adaptive and maladaptive regulatory strategies (Brans et al, 2013; Heiy & Cheavens, 2014; Wenzel et al, 2021), while positive affect may (Wenzel et al, 2021) or may not (Brans et al, 2013) relate to changes in commonly studied ER strategies or may be associated with different types of strategies all together (Heiy & Cheavens, 2014).…”
Section: Emotion Regulation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of literature examining emotion and ER strategy use using EMA methods (Koval, Kalokerinos, Verduyn, & Greiff, 2020). For example, EMA work examining broad categories of negative and positive affect in adults has found that negative affect was associated with increased use of both adaptive and maladaptive regulatory strategies (Brans et al, 2013; Heiy & Cheavens, 2014; Wenzel et al, 2021), while positive affect may (Wenzel et al, 2021) or may not (Brans et al, 2013) relate to changes in commonly studied ER strategies or may be associated with different types of strategies all together (Heiy & Cheavens, 2014).…”
Section: Emotion Regulation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the calculation of SVs in our new CAD paradigm is similarly tied to the strategies with which the strategy of interest is compared. To allow all strategies in the ER repertoire to be recorded for each individual, a study might use ecological momentary assessment 12,78 . This would also capture strategies that are rarely used or are even considered maladaptive, such as alcohol consumption or rumination 79 .…”
Section: Ecological Validity Of Subjective Values Of Er Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the extent, intensity and quality of the affective states and thus the emotion regulation process itself may be relevant [ 106 ]. Empirical findings show that fluctuations in emotional and mood experiences (affect dynamics) themselves seem to have a decisive influence on the emergence, extent and course of psychopathological and distress symptoms [ 32 , 95 , 99 , 107 , 108 , 109 ].…”
Section: The Use Of Epro For Process Monitoring and Early Warning Sig...mentioning
confidence: 99%