2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12140-019-09312-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Special Issue—China’s Belt and Road Initiative: the View from East Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on the initiative can be broadly categorized into two levels: the political level, and the economic level. In the early stages of the Belt and Road Initiative, most studies focused on the political level [11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, with the gradual progress of the Belt and Road Initiative and its results, the proportion of studies on the economic dimension has increased significantly in the countries along the route.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies on the initiative can be broadly categorized into two levels: the political level, and the economic level. In the early stages of the Belt and Road Initiative, most studies focused on the political level [11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, with the gradual progress of the Belt and Road Initiative and its results, the proportion of studies on the economic dimension has increased significantly in the countries along the route.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these conclusions may seem tempting, not all countries endorsed the Belt and Road Initiative in its early stages, with some ASEAN countries expressing concerns, including the Philippines, Malaysia, and Myanmar, who were mainly concerned about the possible debt risks, environmental impacts, and geopolitical implications of the Belt and Road Initiative [11]. These countries aim to protect their national interests and regional stability, and to ensure the transparency and sustainability of the Belt and Road project, while remaining alert to the potential risks involved in cooperation with China, so as to preserve their sovereignty and realize sustainable development through collaboration [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the BRI as an example, most Western authors portray it as a geopolitical project or at least a process transforming the global geopolitical landscape (e.g. Blanchard and Flint, 2017; Flint and Zhu, 2019; Heiduk and Sakaki, 2019; Sidaway and Woon, 2017). In addition to BRI, other examples include the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, BRICS, and international cooperation programs of China as mentioned by An et al (2021).…”
Section: Is Everything About China Geopolitical?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the export market was hit after the beginning of the 2008-2012 global economic depression, joint policies were being implemented in line with innovation, and other similar development issues in China (Das, 2017;Durrani and Forbes, 2018;Jeganaathan, 2017). For example, "China already has an ambitious plan in its Industrial Masterplan 2025 [which] aimed at bringing at least 10 industries to world leadership" (Heiduk and Sakaki, 2019;Sheng, 2017). As a significant innovation in technology in the late 20 th century, the high-speed rail emergence has substantially decreased the travelling time among regions, suggesting considerable improvements at the transportation infrastructural level (F. Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Silk Road: Green Development Innovation Peace and Health Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the BRI must endeavor to change the "Euro-Asia Great Game" from one that risks another major war to a sequence of gradual moves towards peace for more growth for the future generation (Sheng, 2017). Until now, China has avoided countries that are not peaceful and safe but with the exception of a few which it had earlier established strategic alliance before the BRI was established; Pakistan is one of these countries (Cheng, 2016;Heiduk and Sakaki, 2019).…”
Section: Silk Road: Green Development Innovation Peace and Health Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%