2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00661.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Symposium on Collaborative Public Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By any measure, there has been a large increase in such alliances (O'Leary, Gerard, and Bingham, 2006;Gazley and Brudney, 2007;Agranoff, 2007). Different types of collaborative service arrangements can be distinguished on a continuum of cooperation, coordination, collaboration, and service integration (Selden, Sowa, and Sandfort, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…By any measure, there has been a large increase in such alliances (O'Leary, Gerard, and Bingham, 2006;Gazley and Brudney, 2007;Agranoff, 2007). Different types of collaborative service arrangements can be distinguished on a continuum of cooperation, coordination, collaboration, and service integration (Selden, Sowa, and Sandfort, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Joined-up government (JUG) aims at overcoming the problems resulting from the government fragmentation and decentralization led by NPM. The joined-up approach is occurring in different formats, such as in the U.S., under the heading of "collaborative public management" (Agranoff & McGuire, 2003 ;O'Leary, Gerard, & Bingham, 2006) and as in the Gov 2.0 initiative. All these formats are, however, sharing the same goals: to reintegrate the government action disaggregated by NPM reforms.…”
Section: Beyond Npm: Joined-up Governmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the existence of multiple institutions also provides a new perspective on theories of collaborative governance (Sabatier et al 2005, Koontz and Thomas 2006, O'Leary et al 2006, Ansell and Gash 2008. Instead of focusing on the internal dynamics of cooperation within an individual collaborative institution, the EG framework adopts a system perspective that emphasizes how multiple collaborative institutions co-exist with many other types of institutions, including command-and-control regulatory processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%