Transformations of Religiosity 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-93326-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction – Transformations of Religiosity in Central and Eastern Europe Twenty Years after the Breakdown of Communism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has emerged because of the democratization of society, but also the role of religion and the Church in the breakdown of the socialist order. In some places, this has led to a situation where “institutionalized religion and politics seems to have established permanent coalitions” (Pickel & Sammet, 2012, p. 18). Others claim that secularization processes are taking place in the background of the revitalized institutional religiosity, similar to those taking place in the West (Pickel & Sammet, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical‐conceptual Framework Research Aims and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It has emerged because of the democratization of society, but also the role of religion and the Church in the breakdown of the socialist order. In some places, this has led to a situation where “institutionalized religion and politics seems to have established permanent coalitions” (Pickel & Sammet, 2012, p. 18). Others claim that secularization processes are taking place in the background of the revitalized institutional religiosity, similar to those taking place in the West (Pickel & Sammet, 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical‐conceptual Framework Research Aims and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some places, this has led to a situation where “institutionalized religion and politics seems to have established permanent coalitions” (Pickel & Sammet, 2012, p. 18). Others claim that secularization processes are taking place in the background of the revitalized institutional religiosity, similar to those taking place in the West (Pickel & Sammet, 2012). Both diagnoses are correct, but they refer to certain processes in different ex‐socialist countries.…”
Section: Theoretical‐conceptual Framework Research Aims and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unter Bezugnahme auf die zentralen Kontroverspunkte der Religionssoziologie in ihrer ‚neoklassischen' Periode wurden in den Plenarvorträgen Fragen angesprochen, die die religionssoziologische Debatte auch in den Folgejahren beschäftigen sollten: etwa die Frage nach einem theoretisch anspruchsvollen und empirisch brauchbaren Religionsbegriff, der in der Lage ist, auch religiöse Phänomene jenseits der kirchlich verfassten, christlich bestimmten Religion, zum Beispiel New Age, zu erfassen, oder auch die damit zusammenhängende Frage, inwieweit die Säkularisierungstheorie zur Analyse dieser anscheinend an sozialer Relevanz gewinnenden neureligiösen Phäno-mene einen angemessenen Rahmen darstellen kann (Gabriel/Reuter 2004: 30f. (Tyrell 2004;Petzke 2013), zu den neuen religiösen Bewegungen (Riesebrodt 1990;Eiben/Viehöver 1993;Kern 1997;Pollack 2000;Kippenberg 2008) 15 oder zu Kirchen und Religionsgemeinschaften in den internationalen Beziehungen (Brocker/Behr/Hildebrandt 2003). Auch eine regionale Öffnung ist zu beobachten, insbesondere gegenüber den postkommunistischen Ländern Ostmittel-und Osteuropas, die nach dem Fall des Eisernen Vorhangs für die soziologische Forschung zugänglich wurden (Pollack/Müller/Pickel 2012;Pickel/Sammet 2012;Müller 2013). Klassische religionssoziologische Themen finden gleichfalls Beachtung, unter ihnen solche Themen wie Religion im Lebensverlauf (WohlrabSahr 1995), Religion und Jugend (Gensicke 2006;Feige/Gennerich 2008;Feige 2010;Gärtner 2013) (Firsching 1994;Krech/Tyrell 1995;Krech 1998a;Tyrell 2014 Greeley 1997;Jagodzinski 1997. der Forschung zugrunde liegt, 2) inwieweit der Säkularisierungsbegriff zur Kennzeichnung des gegenwärtigen religiösen Wandels taugt, 3) mit welcher Berechtigung sich von Prozessen religiöser Individualisierung sprechen lässt, 4) inwieweit sich das religiöse Feld pluralisiert und welche Konsequenzen dies hat sowie 5) welches die angemessenen soziologischen Zugänge zum religiösen Phänomenbe-reich sind.…”
Section: Aktuelle Tendenzen In Der Deutschen Religionssoziologieunclassified
“…A third approach connects the recent uptick in religiosity to the liberalization of the religious market (Froese 2004;Froese and Pfaff 2001). Empirical data provide support for the path-dependence approach (Northmore-Ball and Evans 2016), but not for the religious market hypothesis (Pickel and Sammet 2012). However, the supply of religious goods provided by churches and religious organizations increased in post-communist countries, because religious organizations extended their networks, and they provide abundant services to population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%