2022
DOI: 10.31224/2586
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introductory consideration supporting the idea of the release of unloading elastic waves in the steady state response of hysteretic soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the numerical results shown in this work, it is important to highlight that these are not dependent on the chosen constitutive model. The other works of the author (Kowalczyk, 2020;Kowalczyk & Gajo, 2022) showed that the same patterns of high-frequency motion computed in soil (and representative of soil elastic waves) can be obtained with different soil constitutive models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the numerical results shown in this work, it is important to highlight that these are not dependent on the chosen constitutive model. The other works of the author (Kowalczyk, 2020;Kowalczyk & Gajo, 2022) showed that the same patterns of high-frequency motion computed in soil (and representative of soil elastic waves) can be obtained with different soil constitutive models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The results are obtained with the chosen calibration of the hypoplastic sand model in a simple numerical study of a 0.8-m-high soil column (32 quadratic finite elements of the size of 0.025 m). Indeed, this numerical example shows the essence of the potential presence of soil elastic waves released upon unloading in the steady-state part of dynamic response (as per the patterns shown in more detail in a parallel work by Kowalczyk & Gajo, 2022). The soil elastic waves are particularly visible for loading cases when the driving frequency (5 Hz) of the input motion is smaller than the soil natural frequency (approximately 25 Hz), such as the case presented in Figure 4.…”
Section: Typical Response Of the Hypoplastic Sand Model To S-wave Pro...mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations