Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices

Abstract

For over 40 years, Professor Bernie Patten, offered a course on Field Systems Ecology at the University of Georgia in Athens, Georgia, USA. The course combined systems analysis approaches and natural field ecology in a way that gave the students new perspectives on making conceptual and formal models of the natural world. The course employed extensive use of outdoor field laboratories at a nearby park, which had multiple ecological habitats. The main progression was to go from simple observations to "seeing systems" to modelling by learning to ask pertinent systems-oriented questions. This started with a structured walk through the six identified subsystems (forest ridgetop, forest slope, field, lake, stream, and wetland) and proceeded to specific field sampling techniques for the terrestrial and aquatic environments. In addition to the field labs, the course required two weekend camping trips, one to the Great Smokey Mountain National Park in the Appalachian Mountains and one to the Okefenokee Swamp/Cumberland Island National Seashore. The idea was to use the two weekend trips to frame the local watershed scale processes at the continental scale. In this manner, students could observe and measure ecosystem processes and interactions at multiple scales. The notes, which are reproduced below, have been further modified for use at Towson University which utilizes a local park in Baltimore County called Oregon Ridge. The general approach of these notes should have universal appeal to anyone teaching or taking a systems ecology course.

Going Deeper or Flatter: Connecting Deep Mapping, Flat Ontologies and the Democratizing of Knowledge

“…As both an artistic practice--or rather series of practices--and an ideological endeavour, deep mapping has the potential to incorporate an approach to spatio-temporal knowledge making that goes beyond more traditional forms of historic recreation, generating, in a sense, a conversation rather than the oration of one "objective historical voice". Shanks [35] applies a parallel reasoning presenting the work of archaeologists as an ecology of practices-a term he borrows form Isabelle Stengers [36]-aimed at mediating the material presence of the past. This approach and perspective offers alternative frameworks for combining creative practice and place conscious descriptions that through inclusive storytelling, create open interrogations of place.…”

Cultura de la auditoría y la antropología en Colombia. Introducción a un debate urgente.

“…Nos parece un tanto obvio, por ejemplo, que un trabajo muy citado sea de calidad; de lo que se sigue que debamos medir nuestro índice h (con Google Scholar o Publish or Perish), y solo cuando empezamos a ser medidos por aquello que nos resulta evidente, empezamos a sentir que algo no está bien. Esta sensación de cosa cierta es uno de los tantos temas que deberíamos pensar más, tal vez probando a ser idiotas, como lo propone Isabelle Stengers (2005), alzando la mano y preguntando sobre eso que a todo el mundo le parece tan obvio. Los efectos de este panorama tienen la capacidad de tocar no solo a la medición misma, sino también a nuestra propia experiencia ética sobre lo que hacemos.…”

A Perspectiva das Pedras: Considerações sobre os novos Materialismos e as Epistemologias Ecológicas

“…Ao desfazer essa linha, encontramos, nos filósofos que se denominam novos materialistas (DE LANDA, 2003;ESCOBAR, 2007;BRYANT;SRNICEK;HARMAN, 2011), e também nos pensadores associados aos estudos sociais da ciência (Sciences Studies) como Bruno Latour, Donna Haraway (2003), Isabelle Stengers (2002) e, ainda, na antropologia ecológica de Tim Ingold, consequências de um pensamento que se situa para além da grande divisão. Ideias tais como coprodução, em Haraway (2003), ecologia da prática em Stengers (2005), engajamento entre humanos e não humanos, em Ingold (2000Ingold ( , 2011, enveredam por esse caminho. Essa posição se opõe à compreensão de Heidegger (1995, p. 263), quando este afirma que "a pedra é sem mundo, o animal é pobre em mundo e o ser humano é formulador de mundos".…”