2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrusion of supra-erupted molars using miniscrews: Clinical success and root resorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mild apical root resorption after molar intrusion has been reported previously 15,16 ; however, root resorption in the mesial aspect after significant molar protraction has not been a finding in clinical reports. 5,17 Interestingly, although the orthodontic movements were applied similarly between the right and left sides, the left side did not present these changes.…”
Section: Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Mild apical root resorption after molar intrusion has been reported previously 15,16 ; however, root resorption in the mesial aspect after significant molar protraction has not been a finding in clinical reports. 5,17 Interestingly, although the orthodontic movements were applied similarly between the right and left sides, the left side did not present these changes.…”
Section: Treatment Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This is consistent with the finding that 76% of supraerupted molars show less than 2 mm. 1 In addition, some studies using 2D analyses showed that the amount of intrusion varied, ranging from 1.2 to 2.3 mm, 12 1.8 mm, 13 2.1 mm, 14 2.4 mm, 15 2.6 mm, 16 3 mm, 17 3.6 mm, 18 and up to 5 mm. 19 The different amounts of intrusion can be partly explained by the different required amounts of intrusion and/or the difference between 2D and 3D measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment duration in this study appeared to be longer than that in other studies. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] The reason being this study included the intrusion of the mandibular molar, which took a longer time for complete intrusion compared to the maxillary molar due to the anatomical difference. It is also due to the loosening of a mini-implant, resulting in the displacement of the anchored tooth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But still it was less than 1 mm Heravi etal, 14 used the miniscrews for the upper molar intrusion and also measure the length of the roots prior and after the intrusion, they found that Mean root resorption of 0.3 ± 0.2 mm for palatal root and 0.4 mm for mesiobuccal and distobuccal root was measured. And they considered these root resorption minor and clinically insignificant.…”
Section: Root Resorption Associated With Rapid Molar Intruder (Rmi)mentioning
confidence: 99%