2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.101997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invaders at the doorstep: Using species distribution modeling to enhance invasive plant watch lists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many sources of the occurrence data of L. catesbeianus from different archives such as GBIF, HerpNet 49 . Many spatial distribution models have been used in various combinations incorporating environmental and biological factors more comprehensively 41 , 49 51 . To evaluate projected range changes of L. catesbeianus in potentially suitable areas under current and future climate conditions, Johovic et al 49 used several algorithms combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many sources of the occurrence data of L. catesbeianus from different archives such as GBIF, HerpNet 49 . Many spatial distribution models have been used in various combinations incorporating environmental and biological factors more comprehensively 41 , 49 51 . To evaluate projected range changes of L. catesbeianus in potentially suitable areas under current and future climate conditions, Johovic et al 49 used several algorithms combined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantification of SEI (Doherty et al, 2022) computed without the conifer threat component was used in these analyses to prioritize areas which demonstrate high ecological integrity in the absence of conifer cover. We incorporated the relative risk of 5 invasive annual grasses (cheatgrass ( Bromus tectorum ), red brome ( Bromus rubens ), Japanese brome ( Bromus japonicus ), ventenata ( Ventenata dubia ), and medusahead ( Taeniatherum caput-medusae )) based on data from Boyd et al ( in Review ), which represents the product of current invasive annual grass cover (average from 2019-2022) derived from the Rangeland Analysis Platform (Allred et al, 2021) as well as modelled suitability for invasive annual grasses (Jarnevich et al 2023a, Jarnevich et al 2023b, Williams et al 2023). Landscape-level structural connectivity derived from a multi-scale model using a resistant Gaussian kernel approach (produced by Theobald et al, in Review ) was incorporated to represent broad ecosystem-level connectivity across the sagebrush biome.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%