2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.13410
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant Data-Driven Subgrid Stress Modeling in the Strain-Rate Eigenframe for Large Eddy Simulation

Abstract: We present a new approach for constructing data-driven subgrid stress models for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. The key to our approach is representation of model input and output tensors in the filtered strain rate eigenframe. Provided inputs and outputs are selected and non-dimensionalized in a suitable manner, this yields a model form that is symmetric, Galilean invariant, rotationally invariant, reflectionally invariant, and unit invariant. We use this model form to train a simple and efficient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although all results shown here were attained with Clark's gradient model as the base structural SGS model, optimal clipping can be applied to other structural SGS models such as Bardina's scale-similarity model, approximate deconvolution models, and data-driven models without modification. In fact, optimal clipping was also tested with the Bardina's scale-similarity [6] and the data-driven model presented in [22], and similar trends to those reported here were also observed for these models. The significant improvement in turbulent channel flow predictions observed here is a motivation for testing optimal clipping for other complicated wall-bounded flows such as a developing turbulent boundary layer, a boundary layer subject to favorable and/or adverse pressure gradients, or even a separating boundary layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although all results shown here were attained with Clark's gradient model as the base structural SGS model, optimal clipping can be applied to other structural SGS models such as Bardina's scale-similarity model, approximate deconvolution models, and data-driven models without modification. In fact, optimal clipping was also tested with the Bardina's scale-similarity [6] and the data-driven model presented in [22], and similar trends to those reported here were also observed for these models. The significant improvement in turbulent channel flow predictions observed here is a motivation for testing optimal clipping for other complicated wall-bounded flows such as a developing turbulent boundary layer, a boundary layer subject to favorable and/or adverse pressure gradients, or even a separating boundary layer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In this article, we will demonstrate the applicability of optimal clipping by using it in conjunction with Clark's gradient model [5]. However, it must be highlighted that the optimal clipping formulation can be easily used with other models: 𝜏 𝑀 𝑖 𝑗 can be defined by Bardina's scale-similarity model [6], the approximate deconvolution model [7] or even a data-driven SGS model [22].…”
Section: 𝑖 𝑗mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of SGS modeling, there are many ways to embed physical constraints into the ML model. One such method for constructing a robust and generalizable SGS model is through the selection of suitable non-dimensionalized input and output quantities of the ML model to ensure that the known symmetries are respected [41]. Another class of methods pertains to the customized neural network architectures that encode the prior physical or mathematical knowledge as hard constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While translation equivariance is already achieved in a regular CNN by weight sharing [92], rotational equivariance is not guaranteed. Recent studies show that rotational equivariance can actually be critical in data-driven SGS modeling [27,66,69,74]. To capture the rotational equivariance in the small-data regime, we propose two separate approaches: (1) DA, by including 3 additional rotated (by 90 β€’ , 180 β€’ , and 270 β€’ ) counterparts of each original FDNS snapshot in the training set [74] and (2) by using a GCNN architecture, which enforces rotational equivariance by construction [92,93].…”
Section: Physics-constraint Cnns: Incorporating Rotational Equivarian...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies have shown that embedding physical insights or constraints can enhance the performance of data-driven models, e.g., in reduced-order models [e.g., [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] and in neural networks [e.g., 38,49,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69]. There are various ways to incorporate physics in neural networks (e.g., see the reviews by Kashinath et al [70], Balaji [71], and Karniadakis et al [72]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%