2020
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/9/091001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant-mass distribution of top-quark pairs and top-quark mass determination *

Abstract: In this study, we investigate the invariant-mass distribution of top-quark pairs near the 2mt threshold, which strongly influences the determination of the top-quark mass mt . Higher-order non-relativistic corrections lead to large contributions, which are not included in the state-of-the-art theoretical predictions. A factorization formula is derived to resum such corrections to all orders in the strong-coupling, and necessary ingredients are calculated to perform the resu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the four cases, this choice provides the greatest sensitivity but remains notably worse than the ATLAS data, as observed in other studies -for comparison, the corresponding ATLAS limits are 172.4 GeV < m t < 173.6 GeV (which remain the same regardless of the CMS distribution included in the fit), while the total cross section provides 171.9 GeV < m t < 175.4 GeV (which varies by at most 0.2 GeV on the upper and lower bounds as the CMS distribution is altered). The fact that the CMS M t t and p T t distributions are generally better able to constrain m t is expected based on theoretical grounds [34,82,83] and has also been demonstrated in e.g. Ref.…”
Section: Choices Of Cms Distributionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Of the four cases, this choice provides the greatest sensitivity but remains notably worse than the ATLAS data, as observed in other studies -for comparison, the corresponding ATLAS limits are 172.4 GeV < m t < 173.6 GeV (which remain the same regardless of the CMS distribution included in the fit), while the total cross section provides 171.9 GeV < m t < 175.4 GeV (which varies by at most 0.2 GeV on the upper and lower bounds as the CMS distribution is altered). The fact that the CMS M t t and p T t distributions are generally better able to constrain m t is expected based on theoretical grounds [34,82,83] and has also been demonstrated in e.g. Ref.…”
Section: Choices Of Cms Distributionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Of the four cases, this choice provides the greatest sensitivity but remains notably worse than the ATLAS data, as observed in other studies -for comparison, the corresponding ATLAS limits are 172.4 GeV < m t < 173.6 GeV (which remain the same regardless of the CMS distribution included in the fit), while the total cross section provides 171.9 GeV < m t < 175.4 GeV (which varies by at most 0.2 GeV on the upper and lower bounds as the CMS distribution is altered). The fact that the CMS M t t and p T t distributions are generally better able to constrain m t is expected based on theoretical grounds [34,79,80] and has also been demonstrated in e.g. ref.…”
Section: Choices Of Cms Distributionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Along with the progress made in fixed-order calculations, in a bid to improve the perturbative convergence and in turn the predictivity of the theoretical results, resummed calculations have also been carried out within a variety of frameworks and the kinematical limits. Examples include the mechanic threshold [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56], the top-quark pair production threshold [57][58][59][60][61][62][63], the low transverse momentum domain [64][65][66][67][68], and the narrow jettiness regime [69]. Very recently, the combination of the fixed-order results with a parton shower has been discussed in [70,71].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%