2008
DOI: 10.1112/jlms/jdn009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant measures and maximal L 2 regularity for nonautonomous Ornstein-Uhlenbeck equations

Abstract: We characterize the domain of the realizations of the linear parabolic operator G defined by (1.4) in L 2 spaces with respect to a suitable measure, that is invariant for the associated evolution semigroup. As a byproduct, we obtain optimal L 2 regularity results for evolution equations with time-depending Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 47D06, 47F05, 35B65.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See, e.g., the book [4] and the references therein. In the case of timedependent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators, the use of the evolution semigroup was essential in establishing optimal regularity results for evolution equations and also in getting precise asymptotic behavior estimates for G(t, s); see [10,11]. However, the general theory of evolution semigroups is well established only for evolution families acting on a fixed Banach space X, which is not our case.…”
Section: For Any T > S That Satisfies (13))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, e.g., the book [4] and the references therein. In the case of timedependent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators, the use of the evolution semigroup was essential in establishing optimal regularity results for evolution equations and also in getting precise asymptotic behavior estimates for G(t, s); see [10,11]. However, the general theory of evolution semigroups is well established only for evolution families acting on a fixed Banach space X, which is not our case.…”
Section: For Any T > S That Satisfies (13))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a backward problem was considered by Da Prato and Lunardi [5] and Geissert and Lunardi [10], since their main motivation came from stochastics. In our case, with the application to problem (1.5) in mind, it is more convenient to work with the forward problem.…”
Section: T Hansel Jmfmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sect. 2, we review and prove results on time-dependent Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators, studied recently by Da Prato and Lunardi [5] and Geissert and Lunardi [10]. By using these results in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counterpart to the paper [16] in the nonautonomous case are the papers [17,25,26] all of them concerned with the nonautonomous Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator which is given by (1.3) when the diffusion coefficients are independent of x and b i (s, x) = N j=1 b ij (s)x j , under the assumptions that the matrix-valued functions s → Q (s) = (q ij (s)) and s → B(s) = (b ij (s)) are continuous and periodic in R (see [17]) or, more generally, bounded and continuous in R, Q (s) is symmetric for any s and its minimum eigenvalue is bounded from below by a positive constant, independent of s (see [25,26]). In both these cases explicit formulas for the evolution family (P (s, r)) solving (1.2) and for the corresponding families {μ s : s ∈ R} of invariant measures are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both these cases explicit formulas for the evolution family (P (s, r)) solving (1.2) and for the corresponding families {μ s : s ∈ R} of invariant measures are available. Such a family of (probability) measures, which is called evolution system of invariant measures in [19] and entrance laws at −∞ in [21], are characterized by the property that Starting from the evolution family (P (s, r)) the authors of [25] introduce the evolution semigroup (T (t)), defined by (1.4) in the space of all bounded and continuous functions f : R N+1 → R (say C b (R N+1 )) and, then, they extend the restriction of (T (t)) to C ∞ c (R N+1 ) with a strongly continuous semigroup (T p (t)) in the space L p (R N+1 , ν), 1 p < +∞, where ν is the only positive measure such that ν(I × B) = I μ s (B) ds, (1.5) for all the Borel sets I ⊂ R and B ⊂ R N . Of course, ν is not a finite measure but to some extent we can still call it invariant measure of (T (t)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%