2019
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab28b1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant measures for typical continuous maps on manifolds

Abstract: We study the invariant measures of typical C 0 maps on compact connected manifolds with or without boundary, and also of typical homeomorphisms. We prove that the weak * closure of the set of ergodic measures coincides with the weak * closure of the set of measures supported on periodic orbits and also coincides with the set of pseudo-physical measures. Furthermore, we show that this set has empty interior in the set of invariant measures.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been known for some time that a generic homeomorphism of a compact manifold of dimension at least 2 has infinite topological entropy. Catsigeras and Troubetzkoy [10] recently proved that a generic homeomorphism of a compact manifold of dimension at least 2 admits an ergodic measure having infinite entropy.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known for some time that a generic homeomorphism of a compact manifold of dimension at least 2 has infinite topological entropy. Catsigeras and Troubetzkoy [10] recently proved that a generic homeomorphism of a compact manifold of dimension at least 2 admits an ergodic measure having infinite entropy.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, Catsigeras has shown in Theorem 2 in [8] that for a typical map f ∈ C(M ), where M is a compact manifold of dimension m, there exists a sequence of ergodic measures µ n , with h µn (f ) = ∞, such that µ n → µ and h µ (f ) = 0; therefore, its entropy function is not upper-semicontinuous. Furthermore, for such f ∈ C(M ), it follows from Corollary 15 in [9] that the set M p (f ) is dense in M e (f ); hence, by Theorem 1.1, E e 0 (f ) is a dense G δ subset of M e (f ), although by Theorem 1 in [9], E e 0 (f ) is a meager subset of M(f ).…”
Section: As a Consequence Of Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this is a consequence of Theorems 16 and 24 in [7] and Theorems 1 and 2 in [9]), so it is not true, for such functions, that E 0 (f ) is a dense G δ subset of M(f ).…”
Section: As a Consequence Of Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.8. Rather than the generic behaviour of h ∈ H(X, µ) (or h ∈ C(X, µ)) for a given µ, one might ask for the generic behaviour of µ ∈ M(X) h , that is, of an h-invariant Borel probability measure µ, for a given homeomorphism (or continuous map) h. It is shown in [19] that for a generic continuous h on a C 1 compact, connected manifold, ergodic measures are nowhere dense in M(X) h . On the other hand, for an irreducible diffeomorphism on a compact manifold without boundary, ergodicity is generic [44,Theorem 7.1].…”
Section: Theorem 27 ([9]mentioning
confidence: 99%