2017
DOI: 10.1090/proc/13591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant random subgroups and action versus representation maximality

Abstract: Problem 1.1. If a, b ∈ A(G, X, µ) are free, ergodic, does κ a 0 κ b 0 imply a b?We provide a negative answer below. The proof is based on a result about invariant random subgroups of G = F ∞ , the free group on a countably infinite set of generators, which might be of independent interest.If I is a countable set and α is an action of a countable group G on I, we will write s α for the corresponding generalized shift action on 2 I with the usual product measure, given by (s α (gWe also let λ α be the representa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ergodic theory [2,1,54,17,56,19], as well as many other subjects. While not quite the same object, we think that G-invariant random subgroups in the algebraic action situation will be important to the study of entropy theory for the same reasons that invariant random subgroups are of relevance to several fields of mathematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ergodic theory [2,1,54,17,56,19], as well as many other subjects. While not quite the same object, we think that G-invariant random subgroups in the algebraic action situation will be important to the study of entropy theory for the same reasons that invariant random subgroups are of relevance to several fields of mathematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%