1956
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.101.1597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
1,286
0
43

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,473 publications
(1,337 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
1,286
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution to this equation yields the affine connection in terms of its independent antisymmetric part B 1 2 ÿ ÿ ÿ in addition to the derivative of the metric [7] …”
Section: The Coset Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The solution to this equation yields the affine connection in terms of its independent antisymmetric part B 1 2 ÿ ÿ ÿ in addition to the derivative of the metric [7] …”
Section: The Coset Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed a mth-rank contravariant local Lorentz and nth-rank covariant Einstein tensor, T m 1 m m 1 n , is defined to transform as [7] T 0m 0…”
Section: The Coset Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The particle concept within the EPS-axiomatics lost credibility when during the emergence of gauge theories of gravity (which started in 1956 with Utiyama [61] even before the EPS-framework had been set up in 1972) the first quantized wave function Ψ for matter entered the scene as an elementary and "irreducible" concept in gravity theory. When neutron interference in an external gravitational field was discovered experimentally in 1975 by Collella, Overhauser, and Werner (COW) [7], see also [52], Sec.7, it was clear that the point particle concept in the EPS-framework became untenable from a physical point of view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%