2017
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/blx140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasion genetics of marsh frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sensu lato) in Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the closely related T. cristatus and T. carnifex were reliably differentiated despite that our reference database was restricted to sequences from another T. carnifex clade (clade S introduced in the Geneva Basin; Dufresnes et al, 2016), deeply diverged from the Basel invaders (clade C). Note also that the technology discriminated and detected another notorious group of aliens: the marsh frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sensu lato), which are invading the Swiss plateau (Dufresnes et al, 2018). Second, populations from both the native and invasive species could be efficiently mapped, as expected given the high detection probability of eDNA (up to 0.97) compared to traditional field surveys (Smart, Tingley, Weeks, van Rooyen, & McCarthy, 2015;Valentini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Edna For the Surveillance Of Aquatic Invasive Speciesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…First, the closely related T. cristatus and T. carnifex were reliably differentiated despite that our reference database was restricted to sequences from another T. carnifex clade (clade S introduced in the Geneva Basin; Dufresnes et al, 2016), deeply diverged from the Basel invaders (clade C). Note also that the technology discriminated and detected another notorious group of aliens: the marsh frogs (Pelophylax ridibundus sensu lato), which are invading the Swiss plateau (Dufresnes et al, 2018). Second, populations from both the native and invasive species could be efficiently mapped, as expected given the high detection probability of eDNA (up to 0.97) compared to traditional field surveys (Smart, Tingley, Weeks, van Rooyen, & McCarthy, 2015;Valentini et al, 2016).…”
Section: Edna For the Surveillance Of Aquatic Invasive Speciesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Second, all five possessed local P. lessonae mitotypes, while parental P. ridibundus normally conserve their maternal lineages throughout hybridogenesis, because of mating preferences: in mixed populations, the large P. ridibundus females are preferentially chosen by the males of the other smaller species, rarely the other way around (e.g. [26]). Third, the nuclear diversity of these females was extremely low (H o = 0.02), as expected for hemiclonal RR individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high diversity of breeding systems, clonal genomes, sex-determination and genetic variation in this frog complex [21, 22], comparative analyses of closely-related groups of populations are of prime interest, since their biogeographic history should not be a confounding factor. In addition, many European populations have been largely compromised by multiple invasions of Pelophylax alien species, resulting in genetic pollution and/or disruption of their hybridogenetic complexes [2326].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Two R-mtDNA haplotypes were found exclusively in P. ridibundus: RID01 and RID08 (following Dufresnes et al, 2018), in fish ponds in which this species predominated (sites 6, 7, 8) and in one LER population (site 5). Both are widespread across Central Europe and have recently spread into Switzerland and France.…”
Section: Diversity Of Cytb Haplotypesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Conversely, ancient as well as recent human-mediated introductions Department of Comparative Anatomy, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Kraków, Poland have led to multiple range expansions and invasions of Pelophylax spp. native to Eastern Europe, the Balkans, Anatolia and Italy (Pagano et al, 2003;Zeisset and Beebee, 2003;Schmeller et al, 2007;Holsbeek et al, 2008;Leuenberger et al, 2014;Dufresnes et al, 2017a, b;Kolenda et al, 2017;Dufresnes et al, 2018;Dufresnes and Dubey, 2020). Habitat conversion seems to have also contributed to the expansion of some water frog species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%