“Invasive” and “Non-invasive” Technologies in Neuroscience Communication

Gaillard, Maxence

doi:10.7202/1044618ar

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(19 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These methods enable the measurement of brain activity throughout the entire brain, albeit with varying spatial and temporal resolutions. However, they also have their own set of limitations and drawbacks, such as the need for expensive equipment, challenges in data interpretation, or potential side effects (Gaillard, 2017).…”

Section: Invasive and Non-invasive Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bridging brain and language: enhancing language learning and communication through neurolinguistic insights

Khramchenko

2023

IAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In today’s interconnected world, the proficiency of English has become a pivotal skill for effective communication and career advancement. This paper delves into the integration of neurolinguistic methodology into teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) and enhancing professional communication. By leveraging recent advancements in neurolinguistics, the author explores the neural mechanisms underlying language processing, bilingualism, language disorders, and their implications for language learning and communication. The paper presents a comprehensive review of key publications in the field and elucidates the multifaceted methodologies employed in neurolinguistic research. The study aims to uncover how neurolinguistic methods offer valuable insights into language learning and communication, shaping instructional strategies and training programs. The author investigates how brain electrical and hemodynamic activity measurements, eye tracking, and computer modeling illuminate the cognitive processes of language acquisition and use. The paper reveals that these insights empower educators to tailor their teaching methods and training programs to align with the brain’s natural language processing capacities. The research identifies the transformative potential of integrating neurolinguistic methodology, providing a bridge between neuroscience and language education. The findings underscore the promise of this interdisciplinary approach, offering a more effective and engaging language learning experience for learners and professionals alike. This paper contributes to the understanding of how neurolinguistic methods can reshape language education and professional communication, offering novel perspectives on optimizing learning strategies and facilitating effective communication in the globalized world.

show abstract

Section: Invasive and Non-invasive Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bridging brain and language: enhancing language learning and communication through neurolinguistic insights

Khramchenko

2023

IAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Invasive and Non-invasive Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2023

IAL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…14 15 [ iv ] For example, it is quite common to describe one medical intervention as more or less invasive than another. 2 Open abdominal surgery is taken to be more invasive than laparoscopic surgery, 21 and optogenetics using nanoparticles is deemed less invasive than optogenetics using brain implants. 22 23 Such comparisons can naturally be understood as suggesting that the two interventions being contrasted differ in the degree to which they are invasive, and that one is invasive to a greater degree than another.…”

Section: Degrees Of Invasivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

What makes a medical intervention invasive?

De Marco,

Simons,

Forsberg

et al. 2023

J Med Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The classification of medical interventions as either invasive or non-invasive is commonly regarded to be morally important. On the most commonly endorsed account of invasiveness, a medical intervention is invasive if and only if it involves either breaking the skin (‘incision’) or inserting an object into the body (‘insertion’). Building on recent discussions of the concept of invasiveness, we show that this standard account fails to capture three aspects of existing usage of the concept of invasiveness in relation to medical interventions—namely, (1) usage implying that invasiveness comes in degrees, (2) that the invasiveness of an intervention can depend on the characteristics of the salient alternative interventions, and (3) that medical interventions can be invasive in non-physical ways. We then offer the beginnings of a revised account that, we argue, is able to capture a wider range of existing usage. Central to our account is a distinction between two properties:basic invasivenessandthreshold invasiveness. We end by assessing what the standard account gets right, and what more needs to be done to complete our schematic account.

show abstract

“Invasive” and “Non-invasive” Technologies in Neuroscience Communication

Cited by 7 publications

References 19 publications

Bridging brain and language: enhancing language learning and communication through neurolinguistic insights

Bridging brain and language: enhancing language learning and communication through neurolinguistic insights

Untitled

What makes a medical intervention invasive?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About