2004
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive cutaneous fungal infections requiring radical resection in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

Abstract: Invasive fungal infections have emerged as a significant problem in patients with cancer with the development of better systemic therapies for malignancy and more effective antibacterial agents. The currently available world published medical literature was reviewed on invasive fungal infections in cancer patients with specific attention devoted to the multidisciplinary role of surgery in refractory cutaneous cases. Infections can develop on the forearm where peripheral intravenous catheters had been inserted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The application of EAT is indicated without delay in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, or in those with signs of focal infection (pulmonary infiltrates, sinusitis, brain abscess, skin lesions and abdominal focus) in which IFI is an outstanding aetiology. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In those patients at high risk for fungal infection, when fever and neutropenia persists without an alternative diagnosis, EAT may be indicated through an individualized clinical decision. In the rest of the patients with asymptomatic fever who are clinically stable (which constituted the main clinical syndrome of PFN) with a low IFI incidence (null in our study), EAT would not be applied and further diagnostic evaluation, including high-resolution thorax scan, galactomannan and abdominal ultrasound, should be performed to establish the aetiology of the persistent fever.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The application of EAT is indicated without delay in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, or in those with signs of focal infection (pulmonary infiltrates, sinusitis, brain abscess, skin lesions and abdominal focus) in which IFI is an outstanding aetiology. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In those patients at high risk for fungal infection, when fever and neutropenia persists without an alternative diagnosis, EAT may be indicated through an individualized clinical decision. In the rest of the patients with asymptomatic fever who are clinically stable (which constituted the main clinical syndrome of PFN) with a low IFI incidence (null in our study), EAT would not be applied and further diagnostic evaluation, including high-resolution thorax scan, galactomannan and abdominal ultrasound, should be performed to establish the aetiology of the persistent fever.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%