2008
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00494-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invasive Infections with Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus after Kidney Transplantation

Abstract: We report two cases of invasive infections caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive, communityassociated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) after kidney transplantation. This report emphasizes the clinical importance of considering CA-MRSA as a causative agent in the differential diagnosis of infections of the skin and soft tissues in organ transplant recipients. CASE REPORTS Case 1.A 32-year-old African American male with hypertension and type I diabetes mellitus who had undergone li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Invasive skin infections with CA-MRSA have been reported in solid organ transplant recipients. These reports emphasize the clinical importance of considering CA-MRSA as a causative pathogen in the differential diagnosis of cSSTIs in organ transplant recipients [14].…”
Section: Immunocompromised and Neutropenic Patientsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Invasive skin infections with CA-MRSA have been reported in solid organ transplant recipients. These reports emphasize the clinical importance of considering CA-MRSA as a causative pathogen in the differential diagnosis of cSSTIs in organ transplant recipients [14].…”
Section: Immunocompromised and Neutropenic Patientsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Physicians and other healthcare workers cannot predict accurately if an SSTI is attributable to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [2]. A prospective observational study of 176 emergency department patients presenting with purulent wounds and abscesses documented that physician suspicion of MRSA had a sensitivity of only 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71, 87) and a specificity of 23.6% (95% CI 14,37) for the presence of MRSA on wound culture, with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 1.0 (95% CI 0.9, 1.3) and a negative LR of 0.8 (95% CI 0.5, 1.3). The prevalence of such infections was 64% [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infectious foci should be drained, and necrotic tissue should be debrided when feasible (7,87,159,224,379,523,525,609,1021).…”
Section: Severe Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been increasing evidence of community-acquired MRSA skin infections affecting posttransplant patients [29][30][31]. In 1 study [30], 3 of 11 (27%) patients with skin or wound infection after lung transplantation were infected with MRSA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that SOTRs should be evaluated and treated for nasal MRSA colonization, as this may lower mortality rates in transplant recipients [31,32]. Regardless of MRSA infection type, sensitivity testing must be conducted owing to potentially large differences in antibiotic resistance between MRSA strains [29].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%