2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-011-0248-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventor networks in emerging key technologies: information technology vs. semiconductors

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors argue that differences in the underlying knowledge bases of industries relate to the density of their knowledge networks. Similarly, Graf (2009) puts forward that characteristics of the search process determine the interaction structure and therefore the evolution of innovation networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors argue that differences in the underlying knowledge bases of industries relate to the density of their knowledge networks. Similarly, Graf (2009) puts forward that characteristics of the search process determine the interaction structure and therefore the evolution of innovation networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, we are mostly interested in the pervasiveness and innovational complementarities; the former creates new combinations between GPTs and previously unrelated technological fields while the latter induce the innovative activities of the connected technologies in the KS. This happens when the costs to generate further advances in the mainstream technology are too high, so that new opportunities to connect previously unrelated fields become economically attractive (Malerba & Orsenigo, 1997;Graf, 2012).…”
Section: General Purpose Technologies and Key Enabling Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define bridging technologies based on two alternative concepts of centrality of a technology (node) within the KS (Graf, 2012). In the first approach, we define BTs as those technologies that serve as catalysts in the KS network by being connected to many other technologies (degree centrality).…”
Section: Bridging Technology Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of semiconductor technology, 1) chips continue to develop in the direction of miniaturization, high density, and high frequencies. 2) The traditional atomic force microscopy (AFM) no longer meet the new testing needs, and scanning microwave microscopy (SMM) based on AFM is developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%