2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventory improvement and financial performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
84
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
7
84
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Vastag and Whybark (2005) demonstrated that there was no relationship between inventory turnover and performance. Likewise, Cannon (2008) found that there was no correlation between inventory management efficiency and overall financial performance. When the effects of time were taken into account, turnover improvement on average had a slightly negative effect on return on asset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Vastag and Whybark (2005) demonstrated that there was no relationship between inventory turnover and performance. Likewise, Cannon (2008) found that there was no correlation between inventory management efficiency and overall financial performance. When the effects of time were taken into account, turnover improvement on average had a slightly negative effect on return on asset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu & Yao (2008), based on 1998 to 2004 listed firms dataset, suggest that the relationship between financial performance and inventory turnover can be characterised as an inverted-U shape. In the same year, Cannon (2008) indicated no link between improvements of inventory performance and overall firm performance. However, Capkun et al (2009), also using the data of listed US manufacturing firms but for the period of 1980 to 2005, show a positive relationship between inventory performance and financial performance.…”
Section: Financial Performancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although inventory efficiency is central to lean operations, other studies have found no significant effect of lean inventories on financial performance (Balakrishnan et al 1996;Cannon 2008). Gaur et al (2005) and Rumyantsev and Netessine (2007) have shown that being responsive is more important than being efficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%