2013
DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inventory model with different demand rate and different holding cost

Abstract: This paper deals with the development of an inventory model for time varying demand and constant demand; and time dependent holding cost and constant holding cost for case 1 and case 2 respectively. Previous models incorporating that the holding cost is constant for the entire inventory cycle. Mathematical model has been developed for determining the optimal order quantity, the optimal cycle time and optimal total inventory cost for both cases. Differential calculus is used for finding optimal solution. Numeri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the holding cost depends continuously on deterioration rate and storage epoch, shortages were allowed and partially backlogged inversely with the waiting time for the next replenishment. Tripathi (2013) investigated an inventory model for time varying demand and constant demand; and time dependent holding cost and constant holding cost for case 1 and case 2, respectively. He considered non-decaying items in his model and gave a motivation to study another model for deteriorating items with discrete holding cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, the holding cost depends continuously on deterioration rate and storage epoch, shortages were allowed and partially backlogged inversely with the waiting time for the next replenishment. Tripathi (2013) investigated an inventory model for time varying demand and constant demand; and time dependent holding cost and constant holding cost for case 1 and case 2, respectively. He considered non-decaying items in his model and gave a motivation to study another model for deteriorating items with discrete holding cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOQ models for deteriorating items with trended demands were considered by Bahari-Kashani [1], Goswami and Chaudhuri [5]. R.P.Tripathi [7] developed a model under time-varying demand rate and holding cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advertise request dependably changes. Tripathi (2013Tripathi ( , 2016 exhibited another technique for stock framework with time subordinate request and time subordinate holding cost by considering two cases. Tripathy and Pradhan (2010) built up a stock model for Weibull is falling apart thing with power request design in which deficiencies are permitted and incompletely accumulated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%