2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-4343(01)00071-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse 3D shallow water flow modelling of the continental shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model initially showed an error of up to two hours in the timing of high tide. A phase error (of varying magnitude) is consistently found in depth-averaged and 3D models of varying types (Bourban 2012, Heemink 2002, Cazenave 2012 when modelling this region. The aim of this paper is to find the cause of the tidal phase error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model initially showed an error of up to two hours in the timing of high tide. A phase error (of varying magnitude) is consistently found in depth-averaged and 3D models of varying types (Bourban 2012, Heemink 2002, Cazenave 2012 when modelling this region. The aim of this paper is to find the cause of the tidal phase error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The model tide is slightly out of phase at Aberdeen and the phase error grows as the tide propagates south down the North Sea finally becoming greatest at Lowestoft and Harwich where model high tide occurs two hours before the observed high tide. Several other models (depth-averaged and 3D) display a phase error of varying magnitude in the Southern Bight (Bourban 2012, Heemink 2002, Cazenave 2012. To investigate the problem further a tidal harmonic analysis was performed and the model was compared to observations across the shelf; the results for the principal component M 2 are shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control parameters might be model initial conditions or model parameters (Thacker and Long 1988). A sizeable amount of research on adjoint parameter estimation was carried out in the last 30 years in fields such as meteorology, petroleum reservoirs, and oceanography for instance by Seinfeld and Kravaris (1982), Bennet and Mcintosh (1982), Ulman and Wilson (1998), Courtier and Talagrand (1990), Lardner et al (1993) and Heemink et al (2002). A detailed description of the application of the adjoint method in atmosphere and ocean problems can be found in Navon (1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the global tidal simulation of FES94.1, Le Provost et al (1994) took a friction coefficient of 0.003 in the pelagic areas of the ocean surface and 0.0025 in the shallow water ones. Third, the BFC are supposed to be spatially varying Lardner 1991, 1992;Ullman and Wilson 1998;Heemink et al 2002). Lardner (1991, 1992) inverted the position dependent drag coefficients and water depth by assimilating sea level observations at a number of tidal stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ullman and Wilson (1998) studied the spatial variability of the BFC by assimilating the ADCP data into a tidal model of the lower Hudson estuary with the adjoint method. Heemink et al (2002) developed an inverse 3D shallow water flow model in which the spatially varying friction parameters were estimated and the independent BFC were selected by analyzing the parameter gradient per grid point. The first two methods have been widely used in the tidal simulations, but the accuracy is relatively low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%